Jacobson P D, Pomfret S D
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029, USA.
JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):921-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.921.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), enacted in 1974 to regulate pension and health benefit plans, is a complex statute that dominates the managed care environment. Physicians must understand ERISA's role in the relationship between themselves and managed care organizations (MCOs), including how it can influence clinical decision making and physician autonomy. This article describes ERISA's central provisions and how ERISA influences health care delivery in MCOs. We analyze ERISA litigation trends in 4 areas: professional liability, utilization management, state legislative initiatives, and compensation arrangements. This analysis demonstrates how courts have interpreted ERISA to limit physician autonomy and subordinate clinical decision making to MCOs' cost containment decisions. Physicians should support efforts to amend ERISA, thus allowing greater state regulatory oversight of MCOs and permitting courts to hold MCOs accountable for their role in medical decision making.
1974年颁布的《员工退休收入保障法》(ERISA)旨在规范养老金和健康福利计划,是一部主导管理式医疗环境的复杂法规。医生必须了解ERISA在他们自身与管理式医疗组织(MCO)关系中的作用,包括它如何影响临床决策和医生自主权。本文描述了ERISA的核心条款以及ERISA如何影响MCO中的医疗服务提供。我们分析了四个领域的ERISA诉讼趋势:专业责任、利用管理、州立法倡议和薪酬安排。这一分析表明了法院如何解释ERISA以限制医生自主权,并将临床决策置于MCO的成本控制决策之下。医生应支持修订ERISA的努力,从而使州对MCO有更大的监管监督,并允许法院让MCO对其在医疗决策中的作用负责。