Gerbasi Joan B
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(3):364-71.
Managed care organizations (MCOs) have become the predominant health care model in the United States. Through cost containment arrangements with providers, incentives for patients to pursue less costly care and reductions in the provision of unnecessary care, MCOs are more intimately involved in the delivery of health care than their former fee-for-service insurance company counterparts. However, this new role has not implied increased liability, largely because of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This article provides an overview of ERISA and a review of the important legal cases in this area, including the three most recent Supreme Court cases. Courts have struggled with interpreting ERISA, and decisions have been difficult to reconcile. Frustration with this statute and the failure of the U.S. Congress to amend it, has led to more liberal interpretations of ERISA in recent years.
管理式医疗组织(MCOs)已成为美国占主导地位的医疗保健模式。通过与医疗服务提供者达成成本控制安排、激励患者寻求成本较低的医疗服务以及减少不必要的医疗服务提供,MCOs 比其以前按服务收费的保险公司同行更深入地参与到医疗保健的提供中。然而,这一新角色并未意味着责任增加,这主要归功于 1974 年的《雇员退休收入保障法》(ERISA)。本文概述了 ERISA,并回顾了该领域的重要法律案例,包括最高法院最近的三个案例。法院在解释 ERISA 方面一直存在困难,各项裁决也难以协调一致。近年来,对该法规的不满以及美国国会未能对其进行修订,导致对 ERISA 的解释更加宽松。