• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于医院输血服务的全自动血型鉴定系统。ABS2000研究小组。

A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 Study Group.

作者信息

Sandler S G, Langeberg A, Avery N, Mintz P D

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2000 Feb;40(2):201-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40020201.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40020201.x
PMID:10686004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The results of routine blood bank testing by a fully automated blood typing system (ABS2000) were compared with those obtained by standard manual methods in six hospital transfusion services.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The ABS2000 system uses microtiter plates for determining ABO and D types, solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) assays for antibody detection, and modified SPRCA plates for IgG crossmatches. The transfusion services used their standard manual test tube methods.

RESULTS

Of 3779 donors' samples tested for ABO types (red cell typings only), 3.0 percent could not be interpreted by the ABS2000 system's neural network, because of clots, hemolysis, or lipemic samples. The results for ABO types were concordant for 99.8 percent of the remaining samples. Of 3779 donors' samples tested for D types, the results were concordant for 98.7 percent. Of 7580 patients' samples tested for ABO types (red cell and plasma typings), 5.8 percent could not be interpreted by the ABS2000 system. There was 100-percent concordance of ABO typing results for the remaining 7140 samples. There was 99. 7-percent concordance of results for patients' D types. The results of 96.7 percent of antibody detection tests and 98.8 percent of crossmatches were concordant. Neither method failed to detect a serologically incompatible crossmatch that was associated with a specific, clinically significant alloantibody. The ABS2000 system performed 45 confirmatory donor ABO and D types in 115 minutes, 22 antibody detection tests in 116 minutes, 16 patients' ABO/D types in 149 minutes, and 40 crossmatches in 140 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The ABS2000 blood typing system automates routine blood bank tests with accuracy comparable to that of hospital transfusion services' standard manual methods.

摘要

背景

在六家医院输血服务机构中,将全自动血型系统(ABS2000)的常规血库检测结果与标准手工方法获得的结果进行了比较。

研究设计与方法

ABS2000系统使用微量滴定板确定ABO和D血型,采用固相红细胞黏附(SPRCA)试验检测抗体,并使用改良的SPRCA板进行IgG交叉配血。输血服务机构使用其标准的手工试管法。

结果

在检测ABO血型(仅红细胞分型)的3779份供者样本中,由于存在凝块、溶血或脂血样本,3.0%的样本无法通过ABS2000系统的神经网络进行解读。其余样本中,ABO血型结果的一致性为99.8%。在检测D血型的3779份供者样本中,结果的一致性为98.7%。在检测ABO血型(红细胞和血浆分型)的7580份患者样本中,5.8%的样本无法通过ABS2000系统进行解读。其余7140份样本的ABO血型分型结果一致性为100%。患者D血型结果的一致性为99.7%。抗体检测试验结果的一致性为96.7%,交叉配血结果的一致性为98.8%。两种方法均未漏检与特定的、具有临床意义的同种抗体相关的血清学不相容交叉配血。ABS2000系统在115分钟内完成了45次供者ABO和D血型的确证试验,在116分钟内完成了22次抗体检测试验,在149分钟内完成了16例患者的ABO/D血型检测,在140分钟内完成了40次交叉配血。

结论

ABS2000血型系统使常规血库检测自动化,其准确性与医院输血服务机构的标准手工方法相当。

相似文献

1
A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 Study Group.一种用于医院输血服务的全自动血型鉴定系统。ABS2000研究小组。
Transfusion. 2000 Feb;40(2):201-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40020201.x.
2
A solid phase and microtiter plate hemagglutination method for pretransfusion compatibility testing.一种用于输血前相容性检测的固相和微量滴定板血凝法。
Haematologia (Budap). 2000;30(3):149-57. doi: 10.1163/156855900300109143.
3
An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital.一家地区急症医院引入血库自动化系统(奥索自动视野创新版)的经验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2015 Aug;53(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
4
Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.使用全自动固相红细胞黏附系统检测弱D型。
Transfusion. 2005 May;45(5):689-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04250.x.
5
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies.对在AutoVue系统上呈现弱血清反应导致ABO血型鉴定差异的临床样本进行的比较分析。
Ann Lab Med. 2017 Mar;37(2):117-123. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.2.117.
6
Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.在伽利略系统中评估用于ABO和Rh(D)血型鉴定的自动微孔板技术。
Clin Lab. 2014;60(2):241-4. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121011.
7
Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.Erytra®全自动分析仪在输血实验室常规使用的评估
Transfus Med. 2014 Feb;24(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/tme.12073. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
8
Economic and workflow analysis of a blood bank automated system.血库自动化系统的经济与工作流程分析
Ann Lab Med. 2013 Jul;33(4):268-73. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.4.268. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
ABO and D typing and alloantibody screening in marrow samples: relevance to intraosseous blood transfusion.骨髓样本中的ABO和D血型鉴定及同种抗体筛查:与骨内输血的相关性。
Transfusion. 2018 Jun;58(6):1372-1376. doi: 10.1111/trf.14557. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation.两种用于输血前检测的自动化仪器的评估:AutoVue Innova和Techno TwinStation。
Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Jun;28(3):214-20. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.3.214.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Evaluation of Automated Immunohematology Analyzer IH-500 for Blood Bank Testing.用于血库检测的自动免疫血液学分析仪IH - 500的性能评估
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Oct;35(4):731-735. doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01127-4. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Blood-typing and irregular antibody screening through multi-channel microfluidic discs with surface antifouling modification.通过具有表面防污修饰的多通道微流控盘进行血型鉴定和不规则抗体筛查。
Biomicrofluidics. 2019 May 13;13(3):034107. doi: 10.1063/1.5080463. eCollection 2019 May.
3
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies.
对在AutoVue系统上呈现弱血清反应导致ABO血型鉴定差异的临床样本进行的比较分析。
Ann Lab Med. 2017 Mar;37(2):117-123. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.2.117.
4
Comparison Between Conventional and Automated Techniques for Blood Grouping and Crossmatching: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre.传统与自动化血型鉴定和交叉配血技术的比较:来自三级医疗中心的经验
J Lab Physicians. 2015 Jul-Dec;7(2):96-102. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.163130.