Bryant R W, Wing G
Aust Dent J. 1976 Apr;21(2):153-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1976.tb02841.x.
Eleven base forming materials used under amalgam restorations were examined for the rate of development of their compressive and tensile strengths. Materials from three categories were compared. Under in vitro conditions of testing, it was found that, immediately after a state of clinical set had been reached, the quick-setting zinc oxide-eugenol materials possessed strengths significantly greater than the calcium hydroxide cements but significantly weaker than the zinc phosphate cements. Calcium hydroxide cements possessed the lowest compressive strength to tensile strength ratio and modified zinc oxide-eugenol materials the highest.
对用于汞合金修复体下的11种垫底材料的抗压强度和抗拉强度的发展速率进行了研究。比较了三类材料。在体外测试条件下发现,在达到临床凝固状态后,速凝型氧化锌丁香酚材料的强度明显高于氢氧化钙水门汀,但明显低于磷酸锌水门汀。氢氧化钙水门汀的抗压强度与抗拉强度之比最低,改性氧化锌丁香酚材料的该比值最高。