Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panagopoulos G, Schein M, Wise L
Department of Surgery, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York 11215, USA.
Surgery. 2000 Feb;127(2):136-41. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.101151.
Surgical incisions after appendectomy for complicated (gangrenous or perforated) acute appendicitis are often managed with delayed closure (DC) rather than primary closure (PC). This study synthesizes the results of other studies in the surgical literature and supports the routine use of PC.
Studies dealing with complicated appendicitis were reviewed to assess the results of PC in comparison with DC. The rate of incision (wound) infection in groups of patients managed by PC and DC were compared with the use of a statistical technique that defined the probability of expected results by incorporating data derived from all of the various study groups.
Of the 2532 patients who had been treated for complicated appendicitis and who were assessed, 1724 patients underwent PC and 808 patients underwent DC. The rate of incision infection was 4.7% and 4.6% in the PC and DC groups, respectively. With a 95% confidence interval, there was no demonstrable difference between the 2 types of operative site management (P < .01).
PC of the skin and subcutaneous tissue after appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, combined with the use of antibiotic therapy in the perioperative period, is not associated with an increased risk of incision infection when compared with DC.
对于复杂型(坏疽性或穿孔性)急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后的手术切口,通常采用延迟缝合(DC)而非一期缝合(PC)进行处理。本研究综合了外科文献中其他研究的结果,并支持常规使用一期缝合。
回顾了有关复杂型阑尾炎的研究,以评估一期缝合与延迟缝合的结果。采用一种统计技术,通过纳入所有不同研究组的数据来确定预期结果的概率,比较了接受一期缝合和延迟缝合治疗的患者组的切口(伤口)感染率。
在接受复杂型阑尾炎治疗并接受评估的2532例患者中,1724例患者接受了一期缝合,808例患者接受了延迟缝合。一期缝合组和延迟缝合组的切口感染率分别为4.7%和4.6%。在95%置信区间下,两种手术部位处理方式之间没有明显差异(P <.01)。
对于坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后皮肤和皮下组织的一期缝合,与延迟缝合相比,在围手术期联合使用抗生素治疗时,切口感染风险不会增加。