Carlsson I, Wendt P E, Risberg J
Department of Psychology, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(6):873-85. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00128-1.
The aim was to investigate the relationship between creativity and hemispheric asymmetry, as measured by regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Two groups, each consisting of 12 healthy male subjects, who got either very high or low scores on a creativity test, were pre-selected for the rCBF investigation. rCBF was measured during rest and three verbal tasks: automatic speech (Auto), word fluency (FAS) and uses of objects (Brick). State and trait anxiety inventories were answered after the rCBF measurements. Intelligence tests were also administered. It was predicted that highly creative subjects would show a bilateral frontal activation on the divergent thinking task (Brick), while low creative subjects were expected to have a unilateral increase. Calculations were made of differences in blood flow levels between the FAS and the Brick measurements in the anterior prefrontal, frontotemporal and superior frontal regions. In accordance with our prediction, repeated measure-ANOVAs showed that the creativity groups differed significantly in all three regions. The highly creative group had increases, or unchanged activity, while the low creative group had mainly decreases. The highly creative group had higher trait anxiety than the low creative group. On the intelligence tests the low creative group was superior both on logical-inductive ability and on perceptual speed, while the groups were equal on verbal and spatial tests. The results are discussed in terms of complementary functions of the hemispheres.
本研究旨在通过测量局部脑血流量(rCBF)来探究创造力与半球不对称性之间的关系。预先选择了两组健康男性受试者,每组12人,他们在创造力测试中分别获得了非常高或非常低的分数,以进行rCBF研究。在静息状态以及三项言语任务期间测量rCBF:自动言语(Auto)、词语流畅性(FAS)和物体用途(砖块)。在rCBF测量后回答状态和特质焦虑量表。还进行了智力测试。预计高创造力受试者在发散性思维任务(砖块)中会表现出双侧额叶激活,而低创造力受试者预计会有单侧增加。计算了前额叶前部、额颞叶和额上叶区域FAS和砖块测量之间血流水平的差异。与我们的预测一致,重复测量方差分析表明,创造力组在所有三个区域均存在显著差异。高创造力组血流增加或活动不变,而低创造力组主要是血流减少。高创造力组的特质焦虑高于低创造力组。在智力测试中,低创造力组在逻辑归纳能力和感知速度方面均优于高创造力组,而在言语和空间测试中两组相当。将根据半球的互补功能对结果进行讨论。