Vinge E, Lindergård B, Nilsson-Ehle P, Grubb A
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999 Dec;59(8):587-92. doi: 10.1080/00365519950185076.
In an effort to increase our knowledge of the optimal use of serum cystatin C and creatinine as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) markers, these variables, as well as lean tissue mass and GFR, were determined in a population of 42 healthy young adults (men and women with normal GFR). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measurement of the plasma clearance of iohexol were used to measure lean tissue mass and GFR, respectively. Serum creatinine was significantly correlated to lean tissue mass (r=0.65; p < 0.0001) but not to GFR (1/creatinine vs. GFR: r=0.11; p=0.106). In contrast, serum cystatin C correlated with GFR (1/cystatin C vs. GFR: r=0.32; p=0.0387), especially in men (1/cystatin C vs. GFR: r=0.64; p=0.0055), but not to lean tissue mass. These results might explain previous observations that serum cystatin C seems to be a better marker for GFR than serum creatinine, particularly for individuals with small to moderate decreases in GFR. However, the results also show that the serum concentrations of both creatinine and cystatin C are determined not only by GFR, but also by other factors. Since these additional factors differ for cystatin C and creatinine, it seems justified to use serum creatinine and cystatin C in conjunction to estimate GFR, at least until it is known in what situations serum creatinine or cystatin C is the preferable marker.
为了增加我们对血清胱抑素C和肌酐作为肾小球滤过率(GFR)标志物最佳用途的了解,在42名健康年轻成年人(GFR正常的男性和女性)群体中测定了这些变量以及瘦体重和GFR。分别使用双能X线吸收法和碘海醇血浆清除率测量来测定瘦体重和GFR。血清肌酐与瘦体重显著相关(r = 0.65;p < 0.0001),但与GFR无关(1/肌酐与GFR:r = 0.11;p = 0.106)。相比之下,血清胱抑素C与GFR相关(1/胱抑素C与GFR:r = 0.32;p = 0.0387),尤其是在男性中(1/胱抑素C与GFR:r = 0.64;p = 0.0055),但与瘦体重无关。这些结果可能解释了先前的观察结果,即血清胱抑素C似乎是比血清肌酐更好的GFR标志物,特别是对于GFR有轻度至中度下降的个体。然而,结果还表明,肌酐和胱抑素C的血清浓度不仅由GFR决定,还受其他因素影响。由于这些额外因素对胱抑素C和肌酐不同,至少在知道血清肌酐或胱抑素C在何种情况下是更合适的标志物之前,联合使用血清肌酐和胱抑素C来估计GFR似乎是合理的。