Oversight mechanisms for clinical research.
作者信息
Snyderman R, Holmes E W
机构信息
Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
出版信息
Science. 2000 Jan 28;287(5453):595-7. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.595.
PMID:10691540
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Oversight mechanisms for clinical research.临床研究的监督机制
Science. 2000 Jan 28;287(5453):595-7. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.595.
2
Shutdown of research at Duke sends a message.杜克大学研究项目的终止传递了一个信号。
Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1246. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1246a.
3
Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.研究伦理。美国国立卫生研究院审查知情同意的标准。
Science. 1998 Jun 12;280(5370):1688. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1688.
4
Duke's hazards. Did medical experiments put patients needlessly at risk?杜克大学的风险。医学实验是否将患者置于不必要的风险之中？
US News World Rep. 1999 May 24;126(20):66-8, 70.
5
Waivers proposed for emergency studies.针对紧急研究提出的豁免规定。
Science. 1995 Oct 6;270(5233):25-6. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5233.25b.
6
Biomedical ethics. HHS plans to overhaul clinical research rules.生物医学伦理学。美国卫生与公众服务部计划全面修订临床研究规则。
Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1315-6. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1315a.
7
Panel faults research consent process.面板故障研究同意程序。
Science. 1995 Oct 6;270(5233):25. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5233.25a.
8
The Office for Protection from Research Risks.研究风险防护办公室
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992 Sep;2(3):279-82. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0013.
9
Protecting research subjects--what must be done.保护研究对象——必须采取的措施。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):808-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009143431112.
10
IRBs search for answers and support during a time of institutional change.
JAMA. 2000 Feb 9;283(6):729-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.6.729.
Zotero 插件