Lee S L, DuBois J J, Rishi M
Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento 95819, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Feb;35(2):327-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90033-2.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Controversy exists whether to explore the contralateral groin in boys during unilateral herniorrhaphy. Proponents claim there is minimal risk of injury to the cord structures and developing testicle with contralateral exploration. However, findings have shown testicular atrophy occurred in 1% to 2% of patients after herniorrhaphy, and vasal damage is possible after routine manipulation of the spermatic cord. This study investigated the effect of routine surgical exploration of the prepubertal groin on testicular development and future fertility.
Twenty-four prepubertal Wistar rats were divided equally into 2 groups. Group 1 (sham) rats underwent unilateral inguinoscrotal incision only. Group 2 (experimental) rats underwent unilateral inguinoscrotal exploration with manipulation of the cord structures as in human inguinal exploration. At maturation, the fertility and fecundity of the males were assessed. After mating, testes were examined for mass, volume, mean seminiferous tubule diameter (MSTD), and mean testicular biopsy score (MTBS). The vasa were examined for histological injury and vasal diameter. Statistical comparisons were made by paired t test and Mann-Whitney rank sum test.
There was a difference between the volumes of the testes when comparing the operative and nonoperative side of the 2 groups (experimental, deltavol = -0.063+/-0.123; sham, deltavol = +0.067+/-0.137; P = .029). There also was a trend toward a smaller testicular mass when comparing the two sides (experimental, deltamass = -0.045+/-0.101; sham, Amass = +0.048+/-0.123; P = .057) but did not reach significance. The MSTD and MTBS were similar between the ipsilateral and contralateral testes in both groups. Likewise, the MSTD and MTBS were similar when comparing the 2 groups. All male rats in both groups were fertile. The number of offspring produced and the number of female rats impregnated were similar between the 2 groups. There was no histological evidence of vasal injury in any of the experimental spermatic cords. The vasal diameters were similar between the 2 groups.
Surgical manipulation of the prepubertal spermatic cord imparts a small, but statistically significant morphological change in testicular size without a deleterious effect on testicular development, fertility, or fecundity.
背景/目的:在单侧疝修补术中是否探查男孩的对侧腹股沟存在争议。支持者称,对侧探查时精索结构和发育中的睾丸受损伤的风险极小。然而,研究结果显示,疝修补术后1%至2%的患者出现睾丸萎缩,常规操作精索后可能会损伤输精管。本研究调查了青春期前腹股沟的常规手术探查对睾丸发育和未来生育能力的影响。
将24只青春期前的Wistar大鼠平均分为2组。第1组(假手术组)大鼠仅接受单侧腹股沟阴囊切口。第2组(实验组)大鼠接受单侧腹股沟阴囊探查,并像人类腹股沟探查那样对精索结构进行操作。成熟后,评估雄性大鼠的生育力和繁殖力。交配后,检查睾丸的质量、体积、平均曲细精管直径(MSTD)和平均睾丸活检评分(MTBS)。检查输精管的组织学损伤和输精管直径。采用配对t检验和Mann-Whitney秩和检验进行统计学比较。
比较两组的手术侧和非手术侧睾丸体积时存在差异(实验组,Δ体积=-0.063±0.123;假手术组,Δ体积=+0.067±0.137;P=0.029)。比较两侧睾丸质量时也有变小的趋势(实验组,Δ质量=-0.045±0.101;假手术组,Δ质量=+0.048±0.123;P=0.057),但未达到显著水平。两组同侧和对侧睾丸的MSTD和MTBS相似。同样,比较两组时MSTD和MTBS也相似。两组所有雄性大鼠均具有生育能力。两组产生的后代数量和受孕的雌性大鼠数量相似。在任何实验组的精索中均无输精管损伤的组织学证据。两组的输精管直径相似。
青春期前精索的手术操作会使睾丸大小发生微小但具有统计学意义的形态变化,而对睾丸发育、生育力或繁殖力无有害影响。