• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移液器的人体工程学设计与性能评估

An ergonomic design and performance evaluation of pipettes.

作者信息

Lee Y H, Jiang M S

机构信息

Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, ROC.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 1999 Dec;30(6):487-93. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00011-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00011-3
PMID:10693828
Abstract

This paper describes the results of an investigation of the differences in performance, postures, strains on hand-arm-shoulder musculature, and subjective ratings of three pipettes (models A, B, and C). Both models A and B were pipettes available on the market. Model C was developed for this study of an ergonomically designed pipette. The gripping posture of the three models was distinct both in the anatomical and in the functional sense. Working with models A and B required a four-finger grasp with a thumb operated plunger. Model C required a finger-palmar power grip and the plunger was operated by the fingers. Performance evaluation of the different pipettes in different tasks indicated that using the proposed model C resulted in a 2-3% lower fault rate, a 10% shorter completion time, and the highest subjective ratings among the three. Postural analysis results indicated that when using model C, the shoulder was the least abducted, the wrist was the least extended, and the wrist was the least radially extended. Model C appeared to provide the greatest opportunity for delicate adjustments of posture in response to the activity of the skin receptors and reduced the strains on the upper body musculature, justifying the ergonomic input into the design.

摘要

本文描述了一项关于三种移液器(A、B和C型号)在性能、姿势、手臂-肩部肌肉组织的应变以及主观评分方面差异的调查结果。A和B型号都是市场上现有的移液器。C型号是为这项研究开发的一款符合人体工程学设计的移液器。这三种型号在解剖学和功能意义上的握持姿势都有所不同。使用A和B型号需要用四指握住并用拇指操作活塞。C型号需要手指-手掌强力握持,活塞由手指操作。对不同移液器在不同任务中的性能评估表明,使用所提出的C型号时,故障率降低了2%-3%,完成时间缩短了10%,并且在三者中主观评分最高。姿势分析结果表明,使用C型号时,肩部外展最小,手腕伸展最小,手腕向桡侧伸展最小。C型号似乎为根据皮肤感受器的活动进行精细的姿势调整提供了最大机会,并减少了上身肌肉组织的应变,证明了在设计中进行人体工程学投入的合理性。

相似文献

1
An ergonomic design and performance evaluation of pipettes.移液器的人体工程学设计与性能评估
Appl Ergon. 1999 Dec;30(6):487-93. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00011-3.
2
An ergonomic design and performance evaluation of handy scanners by males.男性对便捷式扫描仪的人体工程学设计与性能评估
Appl Ergon. 1995 Dec;26(6):425-30. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00070-4.
3
[D.L.vo n. 626/94 - Musculoskeletal diseases caused by use of micropipette in laboratory].[D.L.第626/94号 - 实验室中使用微量移液器引起的肌肉骨骼疾病]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2005 Apr-Jun;27(2):240-3.
4
User-oriented evaluation of mechanical single-channel axial pipettes.面向用户的机械单道轴向移液器评估。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Sep;44(5):785-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
5
Development of an ergonomic four-finger-push manual pipette design.一种符合人体工程学的四指推动式手动移液器设计的开发。
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103045. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103045. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
6
Cumulative trauma disorders: an ergonomic approach for prevention.累积性创伤失调:一种预防的人体工程学方法。
J Dent Hyg. 1997 Summer;71(4):162-7.
7
A questionnaire survey of the ergonomic problems associated with pipettes and their usage with specific reference to work-related upper limb disorders.一项关于移液器及其使用所涉及的人体工程学问题的问卷调查,特别提及与工作相关的上肢疾病。
Appl Ergon. 1997 Aug;28(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00002-1.
8
Controlling dental hygiene work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the ergonomic process.控制与牙科卫生工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病:工效学流程。
J Dent Hyg. 2000 Winter;74(1):41-8.
9
Comparison of muscle activity associated with structural differences in dental hygiene mirrors.与口腔卫生镜结构差异相关的肌肉活动比较。
J Dent Hyg. 2006 Winter;80(1):8. Epub 2006 Jan 1.
10
Ergonomic evaluation of ten single-channel pipettes.十种单通道移液器的人体工程学评估
Work. 2011;39(2):177-85. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1164.