Ogle R, Jauniaux E, Pahal G S, Dell E, Sheldrake A, Rodeck C
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Prenat Diagn. 2000 Feb;20(2):96-9.
The relationship between adverse perinatal outcomes in women with false positive biochemical screening test for Down syndrome was investigated in a retrospective case-controlled study. A cohort of 4000 women who booked for routine antenatal care and opted for biochemical screening over a 22 month period was obtained. The pregnancy outcome data of 272 women with a false positive screening test for Down syndrome (risk >1 in 250) at 15-18 weeks of gestation (study group) were compared with data from 272 age and gestation matched controls with a negative Down syndrome screening test from the same population. The frequency of normal and adverse perinatal outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, isolated intrauterine growth restriction, spontaneous preterm labour and stillbirth was recorded. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 11.9% in the study group and 8.6% in the control group. The estimated odds ratio of an abnormal outcome in the study group was 1.41 (95% CI-0.790, 2.55). The observed difference between proportion was 0.0324 (95% CI-0.022, 0.083; p=0.40). These data identify no evidence for a strong association between a false positive Down syndrome screening test result and subsequent adverse perinatal outcomes in the general population.
在一项回顾性病例对照研究中,对唐氏综合征生化筛查试验呈假阳性的女性围产期不良结局之间的关系进行了调查。获取了一组在22个月期间预约常规产前护理并选择进行生化筛查的4000名女性。将272名在妊娠15 - 18周时唐氏综合征筛查试验呈假阳性(风险>1/250)的女性(研究组)的妊娠结局数据与来自同一人群的272名年龄和孕周匹配的唐氏综合征筛查试验呈阴性的对照者的数据进行比较。记录正常和不良围产期结局的频率,包括子痫前期、单纯性子宫内生长受限、自发性早产和死产。研究组不良妊娠结局的发生率为11.9%,对照组为8.6%。研究组异常结局的估计比值比为1.41(95%可信区间为0.790, 2.55)。观察到的比例差异为0.0324(95%可信区间为 - 0.022, 0.083;p = 0.40)。这些数据表明,在一般人群中,没有证据支持唐氏综合征筛查试验假阳性结果与随后的围产期不良结局之间存在强关联。