Lépine S, Smolla N
Research Unit, Rivière-des-Prairies Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.
Can J Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;45(1):48-54. doi: 10.1177/070674370004500107.
Considering that a literature review yielded limited information on ethical issues concerning participants in child and adolescent mental health community surveys, the authors identify and discuss some of these issues.
First, the authors present the ethical principles set forth by the National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (NCBHR) and evoked by the 1998 Tri-Council Policy Statement, underscoring their importance as guidelines for establishing ethical standards for research with children. Second, they describe the general objectives and currently preferred methods of child psychiatric surveys. Third, they discuss issues pertaining to the validity and innocuousness of structured interview guides, the limitations of parental authorization and children's assent, and the complexity of clinical interventions based on ethical grounds.
The authors emphasize the importance of developing empirical knowledge regarding the questions raised and bringing the social stakeholders concerned into the debate.
鉴于文献综述所获关于儿童和青少年心理健康社区调查参与者伦理问题的信息有限,作者识别并讨论其中的一些问题。
首先,作者阐述了国家人类研究生物伦理委员会(NCBHR)提出并在1998年三理事会政策声明中提及的伦理原则,强调其作为为儿童研究制定伦理标准指南的重要性。其次,他们描述了儿童精神病学调查的总体目标和当前首选方法。第三,他们讨论了与结构化访谈指南的有效性和无害性、家长授权和儿童同意的局限性以及基于伦理理由的临床干预复杂性相关的问题。
作者强调就所提出的问题发展实证知识并让相关社会利益攸关方参与辩论的重要性。