• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童服务与儿童及青少年精神病学之间合作的概念化:基于专业人员定性需求评估的自下而上的过程。

Conceptualizing collaboration between children's services and child and adolescent psychiatry: A bottom--up process based on a qualitative needs assessment among the professionals.

作者信息

Janssens Astrid, Peremans Lieve, Deboutte Dirk

机构信息

University of Antwerp, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, ZNA University Centre Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;15(2):251-66. doi: 10.1177/1359104509340651. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1177/1359104509340651
PMID:20179020
Abstract

Little is known about the need of professionals of children's services and child and adolescent psychiatry to collaborate. This study aimed to explore the perception of practitioners of both services with regard to a future collaborative partnership improving the wellbeing of children in children's services. Eight focus groups were performed and analysed, following the principles of the Grounded Theory. The focus groups revealed that the professionals agree considerably concerning the outlines of the collaboration. They agree upon the primary goal of the partnership, their expected role and tasks. In addition, the partnership should develop in an atmosphere of mutual respect and with the intention to provide the best care for the child. The results of the focus groups are discussed in consideration of a future implementation of interventions on developing best practices at the intersection of children's services and child and adolescent psychiatry.

摘要

儿童服务专业人员与儿童及青少年精神病学专业人员合作的必要性鲜为人知。本研究旨在探讨这两类服务从业者对未来合作关系的看法,这种合作关系将改善儿童服务中儿童的福祉。按照扎根理论的原则,开展并分析了八个焦点小组。焦点小组表明,专业人员在合作要点上基本达成一致。他们就合作关系的主要目标、各自预期的角色和任务达成了共识。此外,合作关系应在相互尊重的氛围中发展,并旨在为儿童提供最佳护理。结合未来在儿童服务与儿童及青少年精神病学交叉领域开展最佳实践干预措施的实施情况,对焦点小组的结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Conceptualizing collaboration between children's services and child and adolescent psychiatry: A bottom--up process based on a qualitative needs assessment among the professionals.儿童服务与儿童及青少年精神病学之间合作的概念化:基于专业人员定性需求评估的自下而上的过程。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;15(2):251-66. doi: 10.1177/1359104509340651. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
3
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
4
Integrating children's services in England: national evaluation of children's trusts.整合英格兰的儿童服务:对儿童信托基金的全国评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Mar;35(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00928.x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
5
Pediatricians' role in providing mental health care for children and adolescents: do pediatricians and child and adolescent psychiatrists agree?儿科医生在为儿童和青少年提供心理健康护理方面的作用:儿科医生与儿童及青少年精神科医生的看法一致吗?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Aug;29(4):262-9. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31817dbd97.
6
An exploration of best practice in multi-agency working and the experiences of families of children with complex health needs. What works well and what needs to be done to improve practice for the future?多机构合作的最佳实践探索以及有复杂健康需求儿童家庭的经历。哪些方面运作良好,未来需要做些什么来改进实践?
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):527-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01554.x.
7
The face of a child: children's oral health and dental education.儿童的面容:儿童口腔健康与牙科教育。
J Dent Educ. 2001 Sep;65(9):821-31.
8
Prioritization of future research topics for children's hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study.儿童临终关怀关键利益相关者对未来研究主题的优先级排序:一项德尔菲研究
Palliat Med. 2009 Jul;23(5):398-405. doi: 10.1177/0269216309104061. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
9
Exploring the experiences and perspectives of families using a children's hospice and professionals providing hospice care to identify future research priorities for children's hospice care.探索使用儿童临终关怀服务的家庭以及提供临终关怀护理的专业人员的经历和观点,以确定儿童临终关怀护理未来的研究重点。
Palliat Med. 2008 Dec;22(8):921-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216308098214. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
10
Introduction of a child and adolescent mental health link worker: education and health staff focus group findings.儿童及青少年心理健康联络专员的引入:教育与卫生工作人员焦点小组的调查结果
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Oct;15(8):670-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01296.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges when Combining Expertise to Provide Integrated Care for Youth At-Risk and Their Family: A Qualitative Study.结合专业知识为高危青少年及其家庭提供综合护理时面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 May;52(3):520-532. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01430-x. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Practical Recommendations for Youth Care Professionals to Improve Evaluation and Reflection During Multidisciplinary Team Discussions: An Action Research Project.青年护理专业人员在多学科团队讨论中改进评估与反思的实用建议:一项行动研究项目
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5639. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
Towards Integrated Youth Care: A Systematic Review of Facilitators and Barriers for Professionals.
迈向综合青年关怀:专业人员的促进因素和障碍的系统评价。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jan;48(1):88-105. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01049-8.
4
An integrated approach to meet the needs of high-vulnerable families: a qualitative study on integrated care from a professional perspective.一种满足高脆弱性家庭需求的综合方法:从专业视角对综合照护的质性研究
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2020 May 9;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s13034-020-00321-x. eCollection 2020.
5
Come together: case specific cross-institutional cooperation of youth welfare services and child and adolescent psychiatry.携手合作:青年福利服务与儿童及青少年精神病学的特定案例跨机构合作
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019 Aug 29;13:34. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0294-z. eCollection 2019.
6
A mixed methods study of collaboration between perinatal and infant mental health clinicians and other service providers: Do they sit in silos?围产期与婴幼儿心理健康临床医生及其他服务提供者之间合作的混合方法研究:他们各自为政吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 11;15:316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0977-y.