Suppr超能文献

淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的结外侵犯

Extranodal extension in lymph node-positive prostate cancer.

作者信息

Cheng L, Pisansky T M, Ramnani D M, Leibovich B C, Cheville J C, Slezak J, Bergstralh E J, Zincke H, Bostwick D G

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2000 Feb;13(2):113-8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880019.

Abstract

Evaluation of extranodal tumor extension may provide prognostic information for patients with epithelial malignancies. However, its importance for the patient who has prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis requires further investigation and clarification. This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of extranodal extension (ENE) in a large series of node-positive patients. The study group included 212 node-positive patients who were treated by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, radical retropubic prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation between 1987 and 1992 at the Mayo Clinic. ENE was defined as cancer perforating through the lymph node capsule into perinodal tissue. Nodal cancer volume was measured by the grid method. Univariate and multivariate risk ratios (RR) for distant metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Cox proportional model. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years (median, 6.1 years). Distant metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival at 5 years for all patients was 91% and 95%, respectively. ENE was found in 126 of 212 patients (59%). The presence of ENE was not significantly associated with distant metastasis-free (RR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.9) or cancer-specific survival (RR = 2.2; 95% CI, 0.7 to 6.8). Among 98 patients with a single positive node, there was no significant difference in distant metastasis or cancer-specific survival according to the presence of ENE (P = .88 and P = .36, respectively). After adjusting for Gleason score, DNA ploidy, and ENE, only nodal cancer volume was significantly associated with adverse distant metastasis-free (RR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.8) and cancer-specific survival (RR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.9). Our data indicate that the presence of ENE is not associated with unfavorable survival in patients with node-positive prostate cancer treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy. In contrast, nodal cancer volume was predictive of distant metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival.

摘要

评估结外肿瘤扩展可为上皮性恶性肿瘤患者提供预后信息。然而,其对患有前列腺癌并伴有区域淋巴结转移患者的重要性尚需进一步研究和阐明。本研究旨在评估大量淋巴结阳性患者中结外扩展(ENE)的预后意义。研究组包括1987年至1992年在梅奥诊所接受双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术、耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术及雄激素剥夺治疗的212例淋巴结阳性患者。ENE定义为癌组织穿透淋巴结包膜进入结周组织。采用网格法测量淋巴结癌体积。使用Cox比例模型估计无远处转移生存和癌症特异性生存的单因素和多因素风险比(RR)。平均随访时间为6.3年(中位数为6.1年)。所有患者5年时的无远处转移生存率和癌症特异性生存率分别为91%和95%。212例患者中有126例(59%)发现有ENE。ENE的存在与无远处转移生存(RR = 1.6;95%置信区间[CI],0.7至3.9)或癌症特异性生存(RR = 2.2;95%CI,0.7至6.8)无显著相关性。在98例单个阳性淋巴结患者中,根据ENE的存在情况,远处转移或癌症特异性生存无显著差异(P分别为0.88和0.36)。在对Gleason评分、DNA倍体和ENE进行校正后,仅淋巴结癌体积与不良的无远处转移生存(RR = 1.9;95%CI,1.5至2.8)和癌症特异性生存(RR = 1.4;95%CI,1.1至1.9)显著相关。我们的数据表明,对于接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术、双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术及雄激素剥夺治疗的淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者,ENE的存在与不良生存无关。相反,淋巴结癌体积可预测无远处转移生存和癌症特异性生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验