Politynska B, Mariak Z, Lewko J
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Academy of Białystok, Poland.
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 1999;44:141-50.
Neuropsychological deficits following closed head injury are responsible for a significant part of the post-traumatic syndrome. Nonetheless such deficits frequently elude standard neurological examination and head injured subjects are not recognised as suffering from any impairments, despite these having a significant effect on their ability to return to work. As a result, subjects are refused disability status, resulting in a large number of litigation appeals. The criteria for determining disability status after head injury are often inadequate, as they do not take into account the post-traumatic syndrome, and medical experts, if they are sensitive to these issues are left in a quandary as to how to justify their decisions before the courts. Equally, psychological assessment, where it is included, is frequently limited to the examination of intellectual functions and memory, which are not always grossly disturbed in these cases. It is recommended that neuropsychological assessments should form part of routine practice in the evaluation of outcome in closed head injury and the test instruments be of adequate sensitivity to measure the deficits occurring after head injury. However, it is necessary to bear in mind that these subjective symptoms, which in reality hamper subjects' ability to return to work, may be the result of disruption of fine cognitive functions, which are inaccessible to currently available test methods.
闭合性颅脑损伤后的神经心理学缺陷是创伤后综合征的重要组成部分。尽管如此,这些缺陷常常难以通过标准的神经学检查发现,并且颅脑损伤患者尽管其能力恢复工作受到严重影响,却未被认定患有任何损伤。结果,患者被拒绝给予残疾身份,导致大量诉讼上诉。确定颅脑损伤后残疾身份的标准往往不充分,因为它们没有考虑到创伤后综合征,而医学专家如果对这些问题敏感,在法庭上就会为如何证明自己的决定而左右为难。同样,即使进行了心理评估,也常常局限于对智力功能和记忆的检查,而在这些病例中这些功能并不总是受到严重干扰。建议神经心理学评估应成为闭合性颅脑损伤预后评估常规操作的一部分,并且测试工具要有足够的敏感性来测量颅脑损伤后出现的缺陷。然而,必须记住,这些实际上妨碍患者恢复工作能力的主观症状,可能是目前可用测试方法无法检测到的精细认知功能紊乱的结果。