Suppr超能文献

不同类型颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的颈动脉及经颅彩色编码双功能超声检查

Carotid and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in different types of carotid-cavernous fistula.

作者信息

Chen Y W, Jeng J S, Liu H M, Hwang B S, Lin W H, Yip P K

机构信息

Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

出版信息

Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):701-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.3.701.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) may undergo direct or indirect shunting. Ultrasonography has value that is complementary to angiography in the assessment and follow-up of these patients. The aim of this study was to characterize findings provided by carotid duplex sonography (CDS) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) in patients with different types of CCF.

METHODS

CDS and TCCD were independently performed by technologists and neurologists. Digital subtraction or MR angiography was interpreted by a neuroradiologist. Ultrasonographic studies were categorized into 4 types: I, direct shunting only; II, direct shunting with a carotid aneurysm; III, indirect shunting only; and IV, mixed (direct and indirect) shunting. In addition to carotid and intracranial flow velocities, volume, and pulsatility, other direct and indirect ultrasound signs of shunting were evaluated. The direct sign of CCF was a mosaic flash detected by TCCD. Alteration of hemodynamic parameters on CDS and demonstration of draining veins with the use of TCCD were considered indirect signs.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (8 men, 7 women) were included in the study. According to angiographic results, patients in ultrasonographic classification types I (n=7) and II (n=3) corresponded to type A of Barrow's classification. Patients with type III (n=8) were Barrow's type C. Type IV (n=1) had a combination of Barrow's types A and C. On ultrasound, both direct and indirect signs were seen in types I, II, and IV CCF. The presence of a 2-colored oval mass divided by a zone of separation without turbulence differentiated type I from type II CCF. All patients with type III CCF had indirect signs, and only 1 patient had direct signs on TCCD. Abnormal TCCD findings were most commonly seen through the transorbital window (100%), followed by the transtemporal window (63%) and transforaminal window (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

If only indirect ultrasonographic signs of CCF are present, TCCD can be used to predict an indirect CCF type on the basis of the origin of the fistula. With direct communication between carotid artery and cavernous sinus, both direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs can be found. The combination of CDS/TCCD may provide a noninvasive and reliable way to classify patients with CCF.

摘要

背景与目的

海绵窦瘘(CCF)患者可接受直接或间接分流治疗。超声检查在这些患者的评估和随访中具有与血管造影互补的价值。本研究的目的是描述不同类型CCF患者的颈动脉双功超声(CDS)和经颅彩色编码双功超声(TCCD)检查结果。

方法

由技术人员和神经科医生独立进行CDS和TCCD检查。数字减影血管造影或磁共振血管造影由神经放射科医生解读。超声检查分为4种类型:I型,仅直接分流;II型,伴有颈动脉动脉瘤的直接分流;III型,仅间接分流;IV型,混合(直接和间接)分流。除了颈动脉和颅内血流速度、流量及搏动性外,还评估了其他直接和间接的分流超声征象。CCF的直接征象是TCCD检测到的镶嵌样闪烁。CDS上血流动力学参数的改变以及使用TCCD显示引流静脉被视为间接征象。

结果

15例患者(8例男性,7例女性)纳入研究。根据血管造影结果,超声分类I型(n = 7)和II型(n = 3)患者对应于巴罗分类的A型。III型(n = 8)患者为巴罗C型。IV型(n = 1)患者合并了巴罗A型和C型。超声检查时,I型、II型和IV型CCF可见直接和间接征象。存在一个被无湍流的分隔区分开的双色椭圆形团块可将I型与II型CCF区分开来。所有III型CCF患者均有间接征象,仅1例患者TCCD有直接征象。TCCD异常表现最常见于经眶窗(100%),其次是经颞窗(63%)和经椎间孔窗(40%)。

结论

如果仅存在CCF的间接超声征象,TCCD可根据瘘口起源预测间接CCF类型。当颈动脉与海绵窦直接相通时,可同时发现直接和间接超声征象。CDS/TCCD联合应用可为CCF患者的分类提供一种无创且可靠的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验