Laties A M, Fraunfelder F T
Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia, USA.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:115-25; discussion 125-8.
To date, sildenafil citrate (Viagra) gives every evidence of being a safe drug for the eye despite a series of expressed concerns. A review of how its ocular safety profile has been identified offers insights into the strengths and weaknesses of present systems and resources for judging the ocular safety of Viagra or, for that matter, of any new drug. Such insights include: The great value of careful, informed assessment of preclinical information gleaned from laboratory experiments. By and large, such assessments point the way toward appropriate clinical evaluation. For Viagra, early in its development it was noted that besides exerting a major inhibitory effect on the intended target, the vascular-associated enzyme phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), the drug also exerts a lesser but definite inhibitory effect on the closely related PDE6, located in the retina. For this reason, preclinical evaluation of the drug included electroretinography plus postmortem histology. In addition, an extended eye examination was incorporated into clinical protocols. The often chaotic but invaluable information stream that becomes available once marketing approval has been gained and large populations begin to use a drug. False alarms, misattribution, and erroneous information are the order of the day. Nevertheless, as information accumulates, patterns of response clarify and the true nature of special susceptibility for subpopulations, if any, becomes apparent. A role for the astute clinician remains: Subtle changes or unusual risks for subpopulations can be missed entirely for long periods of time. A manifest need for improvement in evaluation of postmarketing side-effects. This need has led to the establishment of a new discipline: pharmacoepidemiology. In ophthalmology, the National Registry of Drug Induced Ocular Side-Effects maintains a constant and invaluable surveillance. Examples are supplied to illustrate each of these major points: Our presentation will include data gleaned from clinical trials plus postmarketing information on the incidence, duration, and type of color vision defects observed at different doses of Viagra.
迄今为止,尽管存在一系列已表明的担忧,但枸橼酸西地那非(万艾可)显示出对眼睛是一种安全药物的种种迹象。回顾其眼部安全性概况是如何确定的,有助于深入了解当前用于判断万艾可或任何新药眼部安全性的系统和资源的优缺点。这些见解包括:
从实验室实验中收集的临床前信息进行仔细、明智评估的巨大价值。总体而言,此类评估为适当的临床评估指明方向。对于万艾可,在其研发早期就注意到,该药物除了对预期靶点、与血管相关的磷酸二酯酶5(PDE5)发挥主要抑制作用外,还对位于视网膜中的密切相关的PDE6发挥较小但确定的抑制作用。因此,该药物的临床前评估包括视网膜电图检查以及死后组织学检查。此外,扩展的眼部检查被纳入临床方案。
一旦获得上市批准且大量人群开始使用一种药物,就会出现常常混乱但却非常宝贵的信息流。误报、错误归因和错误信息屡见不鲜。然而,随着信息的积累,反应模式会变得清晰,亚人群(如果存在的话)特殊易感性的真实性质也会显现出来。敏锐的临床医生仍能发挥作用:亚人群的细微变化或不寻常风险可能在很长一段时间内完全被忽视。
明显需要改进对上市后副作用的评估。这种需求导致了一门新学科的建立:药物流行病学。在眼科领域,药物所致眼部副作用国家登记处持续进行着宝贵的监测。文中提供了实例来说明这些要点:我们的展示将包括从临床试验中收集的数据以及关于不同剂量万艾可所观察到的色觉缺陷的发生率、持续时间和类型的上市后信息。