Ulsh P J, Yang H C, Holman M J, Ahsan N
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Pa., USA.
J Transpl Coord. 1999 Jun;9(2):114-8. doi: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.2.t4l566l63m0g1126.
Tacrolimus, microemulsion cyclosporine (Neoral), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 2 and 3 grams daily have demonstrated superior immunosuppressive properties in several recent clinical trials involving solid-organ transplants. An effective immunosuppression may be maintained with lower doses of MMF administered with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporine.
To compare tacrolimus plus "low-dose" MMF-based immunosuppressive regimen (TMBIR) with Neoral plus "low-dose" MMF-based immunosuppressive regimens (NMBIR) among kidney transplant recipients.
Prospective, randomized study.
53 consecutive adult recipients of kidney transplant. Both groups (TMBIR and NMBIR) were equally matched on demographic characteristics.
Participants were randomized to receive orally either tacrolimus (0.08 mg/kg twice daily) (n = 27) or Neoral (4 mg/kg twice daily) (n = 26). Both regimens were started before surgery and continued when allograft demonstrated no postoperative acute tubular necrosis. Both groups received similar "low-dose" MMF (500 mg twice daily) and prednisone (2 mg/kg/day to taper off after 1 year). Switch from tacrolimus to Neoral or vice versa was allowed after refractory rejection or serious adverse events.
Acute rejection and patient and graft survival 1 year following kidney transplant.
One-year patient survival rates were 88.9% for the TMBIR group and 100% for the NMBIR group; 1-year graft survival rates were 88.9% for the TMBIR group and 96.1% for the NMBIR group. No significant differences were found in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (14.8% TMBIR vs 23% NMBIR). Steroid-resistant rejections requiring cytolytic antibody therapy were higher in the NMBIR group (50% vs 25%). Three patients crossed over from NMBIR to TMBIR for refractory rejections and 1 patient crossed over from TMBIR to NMBIR for new onset seizure. Three episodes of cytomegalovirus infection were observed in the TMBIR group. Other adverse events were similar in both groups.
Both tacrolimus and microemulsion cyclosporine combined with "low-dose" MMF and corticosteroids provide effective immunosuppression and have similar adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.
在最近几项涉及实体器官移植的临床试验中,他克莫司、微乳环孢素(新山地明)以及每日剂量为2克和3克的霉酚酸酯(MMF)已显示出卓越的免疫抑制特性。与他克莫司或微乳环孢素联合使用时,较低剂量的MMF即可维持有效的免疫抑制。
在肾移植受者中比较他克莫司联合“低剂量”MMF的免疫抑制方案(TMBIR)与新山地明联合“低剂量”MMF的免疫抑制方案(NMBIR)。
前瞻性随机研究。
53例连续的成年肾移植受者。两组(TMBIR和NMBIR)在人口统计学特征上匹配。
参与者被随机分组,口服他克莫司(0.08毫克/千克,每日两次)(n = 27)或新山地明(4毫克/千克,每日两次)(n = 26)。两种方案均在手术前开始,当移植肾未出现术后急性肾小管坏死时继续使用。两组均接受相似的“低剂量”MMF(500毫克,每日两次)和泼尼松(2毫克/千克/天,1年后逐渐减量)。在难治性排斥反应或严重不良事件后,允许从他克莫司换用新山地明或反之。
肾移植后1年的急性排斥反应、患者及移植肾存活率。
TMBIR组1年患者存活率为88.9%,NMBIR组为100%;TMBIR组1年移植肾存活率为88.9%,NMBIR组为96.1%。活检证实的急性排斥反应发生率无显著差异(TMBIR组为14.8%,NMBIR组为23%)。NMBIR组中需要溶细胞抗体治疗的激素抵抗性排斥反应更高(50%对25%)。3例患者因难治性排斥反应从NMBIR组转至TMBIR组,1例患者因新发癫痫从TMBIR组转至NMBIR组。TMBIR组观察到3例巨细胞病毒感染发作。两组的其他不良事件相似。
他克莫司和微乳环孢素与“低剂量”MMF及皮质类固醇联合使用,在肾移植受者中均能提供有效的免疫抑制,且不良事件相似。