Thrall M M, Wood P, King V, Rivera W, Hrushesky W
Stratton VAMC, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Mar 1;46(4):873-81. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00456-3.
To compare the relative toxicities of bolus versus infusional 5-FU chemotherapy administrated concurrently during external beam irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following surgical extirpation.
A total of 26 eligible patients were retrospectively identified as having been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma at the Stratton VAMC between 1989 and 1997. A comparative analysis of treatment dose intensities, treatment delays and toxicities in these patients was performed.
Significantly less WBC toxicity was observed in the patients receiving infusional 5-FU chemotherapy. The other toxicities, with the exception of skin toxicity, were generally less frequent in the 5-FU infusional group. When the toxicities were corrected for 5-FU dose intensity, to yield toxicity per mg of 5-FU, statistically significant differences were found for hematological toxicity (WBC and platelets), and for gastrointestinal toxicity (frequency and severity of diarrhea and weight loss). The majority of patients receiving infusional 5-FU therapy were treated using a circadian pattern of treatment peaking around the time of the radiation therapy. Patients receiving infusional 5-FU were able to tolerate over twice the dose intensity as those receiving bolus administration. Local recurrence rate in all patients was 3.8% comparing favorably to other reported studies. Distant recurrence frequency was also acceptable at 34.6% for the group.
Infusional 5-FU chemotherapy compared with bolus therapy during pelvic radiation minimizes toxicity to the patient while maximizing the dose of 5-FU that can be delivered. As infusional 5-FU therapy during radiation has previously been shown to increase disease free duration and survival, infusional 5-FU should be considered as an acceptable standard of care to prevent local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma following its resection. Shaping this infusional 5-FU chemotherapy within the day so that most of the daily dose is delivered around the time of the radiation therapy may further modify the toxic therapeutic ratio of combined modality therapy.
比较在手术切除后局部晚期直肠癌患者进行外照射期间,推注式与输注式5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)化疗同时给药的相对毒性。
回顾性确定了1989年至1997年间在斯特拉顿退伍军人医疗中心接受直肠腺癌治疗的26例符合条件的患者。对这些患者的治疗剂量强度、治疗延迟和毒性进行了比较分析。
接受输注式5-FU化疗的患者中观察到的白细胞毒性明显较低。除皮肤毒性外,5-FU输注组的其他毒性通常较少见。当根据5-FU剂量强度校正毒性,以得出每毫克5-FU的毒性时,发现血液学毒性(白细胞和血小板)以及胃肠道毒性(腹泻频率和严重程度以及体重减轻)存在统计学显著差异。大多数接受输注式5-FU治疗的患者采用昼夜治疗模式,在放疗时间左右达到峰值。接受输注式5-FU的患者能够耐受的剂量强度是接受推注给药患者的两倍以上。所有患者的局部复发率为3.8%,与其他报道的研究相比具有优势。该组的远处复发频率也可接受,为34.6%。
在盆腔放疗期间,输注式5-FU化疗与推注疗法相比,可将对患者的毒性降至最低,同时使可给予的5-FU剂量最大化。由于先前已证明放疗期间的输注式5-FU疗法可增加无病生存期和生存率,因此输注式5-FU应被视为预防直肠腺癌切除后局部复发可接受的标准治疗方法。在一天内安排这种输注式5-FU化疗,使大部分每日剂量在放疗时间左右给予,可能会进一步改善联合治疗模式的毒性治疗比。