Suppr超能文献

系列体格检查在穿透性腹部创伤中的疗效

The efficacy of serial physical examination in penetrating abdominal trauma.

作者信息

van Haarst E P, van Bezooijen B P, Coene P P, Luitse J S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 1999 Nov;30(9):599-604. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00159-x.

Abstract

Over a 10-year period we reviewed the records of 370 consecutive patients with potentially penetrating abdominal wounds (48 gunshot and 322 stab wounds). Selective non-operative management for abdominal stab wounds was introduced, guided by serial physical examination. In our study the terms therapeutic and non-therapeutic laparotomies were used, the latter comprising negative as well as insignificant findings. Initially diagnostic peritoneal lavage and local wound exploration were used, but these methods were later abandoned. Mortality was 10.2% and morbidity 25% in the group of gunshot wounds and 1.2% and 8.6% in the group of stab wounds. During this period the rate of laparotomies for stab wounds decreased from 55% to 30%, while the rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies decreased from 24% to 0% in the last year. Delayed laparotomy did not cause death or increase morbidity. Our results support the concept of selective non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds using repeated physical examination. Peritoneal perforation and haemoperitoneum should not be an indication for routine laparotomy.

摘要

在10年期间,我们回顾了370例连续性腹部潜在穿透伤患者的记录(48例枪伤和322例刺伤)。在连续体格检查的指导下,引入了腹部刺伤的选择性非手术治疗。在我们的研究中,使用了治疗性剖腹术和非治疗性剖腹术这两个术语,后者包括阴性以及无意义的发现。最初使用诊断性腹腔灌洗和局部伤口探查,但这些方法后来被放弃。枪伤组的死亡率为10.2%,发病率为25%;刺伤组的死亡率为1.2%,发病率为8.6%。在此期间,刺伤的剖腹术发生率从55%降至30%,而最后一年非治疗性剖腹术的发生率从24%降至0%。延迟剖腹术未导致死亡或增加发病率。我们的结果支持使用重复体格检查对腹部刺伤进行选择性非手术治疗的概念。腹膜穿孔和腹腔积血不应作为常规剖腹术的指征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验