Hallqvist J, Möller J, Ahlbom A, Diderichsen F, Reuterwall C, de Faire U
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Sundbyberg, Sweden.
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;151(5):459-67. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010231.
To study possible triggering of first events of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion, the authors conducted a case-crossover analysis (1993-1994) within a population-based case-referent study in Stockholm County, Sweden (the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program). Interviews were carried out with 699 myocardial infarction patients after onset of the disease. These cases represented 47 percent of all cases in the study base, and 70 percent of all nonfatal cases. The relative risk from vigorous exertion was 6.1 (95% confidence interval: 4.2, 9.0). The rate difference was 1.5 per million person-hours, and the attributable proportion was 5.7 percent. The risk was modified by physical fitness, with an increased risk being seen among sedentary subjects as in earlier studies, but the data also suggested a U-shaped association. In addition, the trigger effect was modified by socioeconomic status. Premonitory symptoms were common, and this implies risks of reverse causation bias and misclassification of case exposure information that require methodological consideration. Different techniques (the use of the usual-frequency type of control information, a pair-matched analysis, and a standard case-referent analysis) were applied to overcome the threat of misclassification of control exposure information. A case-crossover analysis in a random sample of healthy subjects resulted in a relative risk close to unity, as expected.
为研究剧烈体力活动是否可能引发急性心肌梗死的首发事件,作者在瑞典斯德哥尔摩县一项基于人群的病例对照研究(斯德哥尔摩心脏流行病学项目)中进行了病例交叉分析(1993 - 1994年)。在疾病发作后对699名心肌梗死患者进行了访谈。这些病例占研究基数中所有病例的47%,占所有非致命病例的70%。剧烈运动导致的相对风险为6.1(95%置信区间:4.2, 9.0)。每百万小时的率差为1.5,归因比例为5.7%。风险因身体素质而有所改变,与早期研究一样,久坐不动的受试者风险增加,但数据也表明存在U型关联。此外,触发效应因社会经济地位而有所改变。先兆症状很常见,这意味着存在反向因果偏差和病例暴露信息错误分类的风险,需要从方法学角度加以考虑。应用了不同的技术(使用通常频率类型的对照信息、配对分析和标准病例对照分析)来克服对照暴露信息错误分类的威胁。正如预期的那样,对健康受试者随机样本进行的病例交叉分析得出的相对风险接近1。