Drobniewski F A, Watterson S A, Wilson S M, Harris G S
Public Health Laboratory Service Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Dulwich Public Health Laboratory and Department of Microbiology, Guy's King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London SE22 8QF.
J Med Microbiol. 2000 Mar;49(3):271-278. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-3-271.
A clinical, microbiological and economic study of a national rapid molecular service for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the determination of rifampicin resistance in smear-positive sputum samples (and other primary specimens) was performed. Ninety-one primary specimens, of which 55 were smear-positive sputum, were examined by molecular and conventional assays. Concordance of molecular results from smear-positive sputum specimens with tuberculosis diagnosis and rifampicin resistance by conventional analysis was 52 (94.5%) of 55 and 44 (91.7%) of 48, respectively. Concordance of molecular analysis on all primary specimens was 81 (89.0%) of 91 (diagnosis) and 55 (90.2%) of 61 (rifampicin resistance). Approximately 28 days were saved in the time to diagnosis by using the molecular assay. Hospitals can reduce the cost of inappropriate isolation of patients with risk factors for multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB) who subsequently are shown to have drug-sensitive tuberculosis. At one hospital potential annual savings were between pound sterling 50000 and pound sterling 150000. Of the nine MDRTB cases identified, all had a previous diagnosis of tuberculosis, 78% were born overseas, 44% were known to be non-compliant with therapy, but only one case (12.5%) was HIV positive. HIV status was not significantly different between MDRTB and drug-sensitive tuberculosis cases. Over 75% of specimens were taken while the patient was on therapy. Isolates from >50% of the MDRTB cases were resistant to three or more drugs and one was resistant to seven drugs. All patients were placed on additional therapy once the molecular result was known; this was subsequently modified based on the results of in-vitro drug susceptibility testing. All survived at least 6 months of follow-up. There was no difference in the proportion of successful cultures from smear-positive samples from patients with drug-sensitive tuberculosis or MDRTB who were on therapy. Molecular rifampicin resistance assays are reliable for diagnosis in cases with smear-positive disease.
开展了一项针对全国快速分子检测服务的临床、微生物学和经济学研究,该服务用于在涂片阳性痰标本(及其他原始标本)中鉴定结核分枝杆菌并测定利福平耐药性。通过分子检测和传统检测方法对91份原始标本进行了检测,其中55份为涂片阳性痰标本。涂片阳性痰标本分子检测结果与传统分析诊断结核病及利福平耐药性的一致性分别为55份中的52份(94.5%)和48份中的44份(91.7%)。所有原始标本分子检测的一致性为91份中的81份(89.0%)(诊断)和61份中的55份(90.2%)(利福平耐药性)。使用分子检测方法诊断时间大约节省了28天。医院可以降低对具有耐多药结核病(MDRTB)危险因素但随后被证明患有药物敏感结核病患者进行不适当隔离的成本。在一家医院,每年潜在节省金额在50000英镑至150000英镑之间。在鉴定出的9例MDRTB病例中,所有病例既往均诊断为结核病,78%出生在海外,44%已知不遵守治疗方案,但只有1例(12.5%)为HIV阳性。MDRTB病例和药物敏感结核病病例的HIV感染状况无显著差异。超过75%的标本是在患者接受治疗时采集的。超过50%的MDRTB病例分离株对三种或更多药物耐药,1例对七种药物耐药。一旦得知分子检测结果,所有患者均接受了额外治疗;随后根据体外药敏试验结果进行了调整。所有患者至少存活了6个月的随访期。接受治疗的药物敏感结核病或MDRTB患者涂片阳性样本的培养成功率比例没有差异。分子利福平耐药性检测对于涂片阳性疾病的诊断是可靠的。