Leong C S, Cascade P N, Kazerooni E A, Bolling S F, Deeb G M
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0326, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):383-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00016.
To evaluate the use of bedside chest radiography and patient outcome before and after implementation of a cardiac surgery critical care pathway that included guidelines for bedside radiography.
A cohort observational study.
A university hospital in the midwest.
Three groups, of 100 patients each, undergoing cardiac surgery in 1990, 1991, and 1995.
Introduction of a critical care pathway.
Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in three groups of 100 patients each: before the introduction of the critical care pathway; 2 months after introduction of the pathway in 1991; and 4 yrs after introduction in 1995. Data were analyzed to determine operative risk for each group. Subsequent analyses determined bedside radiography use, total length of hospital stay, and patient outcome (mortality rate, complications requiring intervention, and reoperation) during hospitalization and at outpatient follow-up 15-30 days postdischarge.
Total length of hospital stay was shorter for the 1995 group (7.6+/-6.6 days) compared with other groups (prepathway, 11.1+/-10.3 days; 1991 postpathway, 10.2+/-9.6 days; p<.05). The mean numbers of radiographs per patient were as follows: prepathway, 5.1; 1991 postpathway, 5.2; and 1995 postpathway, 3.3. The mean number of radiographs in the 1995 group was significantly lower (p = .02). More patients had the proposed number of two bedside radiographs described in the pathway in the 1995 group compared with the other groups (prepathway, p<.0001; the two-month postpathway group, p = .01). Twenty-three malpositioned catheters/tubes were found in the prepathway and 1991 groups compared with 11 in the 1995 group (p = .02). No statistically significant difference was found in inpatient complications (mediastinal bleeding, pneumothoraces, and pleural effusions), postdischarge complications, reoperations, or mortality rate.
Introduction of a critical care pathway can decrease the use of bedside radiography without adversely affecting near-term patient outcomes.
评估在实施包含床边X线摄影指南的心脏手术重症监护路径前后床边胸部X线摄影的使用情况及患者预后。
队列观察性研究。
中西部的一家大学医院。
1990年、1991年和1995年分别有三组患者,每组100例接受心脏手术。
引入重症监护路径。
对每组100例患者的病历进行回顾性分析:重症监护路径引入前;1991年路径引入后2个月;1995年路径引入后4年。分析数据以确定每组的手术风险。随后的分析确定了床边X线摄影的使用情况、住院总时长以及患者在住院期间和出院后15 - 30天门诊随访时的预后(死亡率、需要干预的并发症和再次手术情况)。
1995年组的住院总时长(7.6±6.6天)比其他组短(路径引入前,11.1±10.3天;1991年路径引入后,10.2±9.6天;p<0.05)。每位患者的X线片平均数量如下:路径引入前,5.1张;1991年路径引入后,5.2张;1995年路径引入后,3.3张。1995年组的X线片平均数量显著更低(p = 0.02)。与其他组相比,1995年组更多患者的床边X线片数量符合路径中建议的两张(路径引入前,p<0.0001;路径引入后两个月组,p = 0.01)。路径引入前组和1991年组发现23根位置不当的导管/引流管,而1995年组为11根(p = 0.02)。在住院并发症(纵隔出血、气胸和胸腔积液)、出院后并发症、再次手术或死亡率方面未发现统计学显著差异。
引入重症监护路径可减少床边X线摄影的使用,且不会对近期患者预后产生不利影响。