Rogers P L, Jacob H, Thomas E A, Harwell M, Willenkin R L, Pinsky M R
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15240, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):550-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00043.
To determine whether fourth-year medical students can learn the basic analytic, evaluative, and psychomotor skills needed to initially manage a critically ill patient.
Student learning was evaluated using a performance examination, the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Students were randomly assigned to one of two clinical scenarios before the elective. After the elective, students completed the other scenario, using a crossover design.
Five surgical intensive care units in a tertiary care university teaching hospital.
Forty fourth-year medical students enrolled in the critical care medicine (CCM) elective.
All students evaluated a live "simulated critically ill" patient, requested physiologic data from a nurse, ordered laboratory tests, received data in real time, and intervened as they deemed appropriate.
Student performance of specific behavioral objectives was evaluated at five stations. They were expected to a) assess airway, breathing, and circulation in appropriate sequence; b) prepare a manikin for intubation, obtain an acceptable airway on the manikin, demonstrate bag-mouth ventilation, and perform acceptable laryngoscopy and intubation; c) provide appropriate mechanical ventilator settings; d) manage hypotension; and e) request and interpret pulmonary artery data and initiate appropriate therapy. OSCEs were videotaped and reviewed by two faculty members masked to time of examination. A checklist of key behaviors was used to evaluate performance. The primary outcome measure was the difference in examination score before and after the rotation. Secondary outcomes included the difference in scores at each rotation. The mean preelective score was 57.0%+/-8.3% compared with 85.9%+/-7.4% (p<.0001) after the elective. Significant improvement was demonstrated at each station except station I.
Fourth-year medical students without a CCM elective do not possess the basic cognitive and psychomotor skills necessary to initially manage critically ill patients. After an appropriate 1-month CCM elective, students' thinking and application skills required to initially manage critically ill patients improved markedly, as demonstrated by an OSCE using a live simulated "patient" and manikin.
确定四年级医学生是否能够掌握初步管理危重症患者所需的基本分析、评估和操作技能。
采用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对学生学习情况进行评估。在选修课之前,学生被随机分配到两种临床场景之一。选修课之后,学生采用交叉设计完成另一种场景。
一所三级大学教学医院的五个外科重症监护病房。
40名参加重症医学(CCM)选修课的四年级医学生。
所有学生对一名“模拟危重症”患者进行评估,向护士索要生理数据,开具实验室检查医嘱,实时接收数据,并在他们认为合适时进行干预。
在五个站点评估学生特定行为目标的表现。要求他们:a)按适当顺序评估气道、呼吸和循环;b)为模拟人准备插管,在模拟人上获得可接受的气道,演示面罩通气,并进行可接受的喉镜检查和插管;c)提供适当的机械通气设置;d)处理低血压;e)索要并解读肺动脉数据并启动适当治疗。OSCE进行了录像,由两名对考试时间不知情的教员进行评审。使用关键行为清单评估表现。主要结局指标是轮转前后考试分数的差异。次要结局包括每次轮转时分数的差异。选修课前平均分数为57.0%±8.3%,选修课之后为85.9%±7.4%(p<0.0001)。除站点I外,每个站点均显示出显著改善。
未参加CCM选修课的四年级医学生不具备初步管理危重症患者所需的基本认知和操作技能。经过为期1个月的适当CCM选修课后,学生初步管理危重症患者所需的思维和应用技能有显著提高,这通过使用现场模拟“患者”和模拟人的OSCE得到证明。