Shen Liqiong, Zeng Huiwen, Jin Xiaoyan, Yang Jing, Shang Shaomei, Zhang Yan
School of Nursing, Peking University, China.
Peking University School of Stomatology, China.
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;34(5):412-416. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 2.
To build an examination model relating to
This study is to design an examination model based on literature and teaching purposes of
This study was conducted in the nursing school of one comprehensive university in Beijing, China.
99 undergraduate nursing students in second year participated in this study.
The OSCE consisted of 4 interactive simulated patient stations, 2 operating stations without standard patients, 2 theoretical stations. We designed 4 standardized process-based case scenarios and corresponding scripts pertinent to each station. 4 standard patients and 8 teachers of
The average score of overall fundamental nursing skills was 90.51 ± 4.00. The Cronbach alpha was 0.665, demonstrating the OSCE is reliable. The content validity of each station varies from 0.90-1, and the criterion validity was promising (R = 0.661, p = 0.000). Also, most students were in favor of OSCE to evaluate in
The OSCE is a reliable and valid assessment tool in
《基础护理学》是护理专业学生的第一门专业课程,为护理教育奠定基础。《基础护理学》包含许多重要的基础护理技能,这表明传统考试无法评估学生的学习效果。自客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)出现以来,它已在新毕业护士、护理学研究生中使用并取得了一定成效。尽管很少有研究将其付诸实践,但OSCE可能是评估和反映学生基础护理技能及综合能力的更好方式。
构建基于OSCE的《基础护理学》考试模式,并将该考试模式付诸实践,然后评估其信效度。
本研究基于文献和《基础护理学》的教学目的设计考试模式。采用定量描述性调查方法获取学生的考试结果以及学生对考试过程和结果的看法。
本研究在中国北京某综合性大学的护理学院进行。
99名本科二年级护理专业学生参与了本研究。
OSCE包括4个互动模拟患者站、2个无标准化患者的操作站、2个理论站。我们针对每个站点设计了4个基于标准化流程的病例场景及相应脚本。在实施客观结构化临床考试前,招募、培训并评估了4名标准化患者和8名《基础护理学》教师。
基础护理技能总体平均分为90.51±4.00。克朗巴哈系数为0.665,表明OSCE可靠。各站点的内容效度在0.90 - 1之间,效标效度良好(R = 0.661,p = 0.000)。此外,大多数学生赞成用OSCE对《基础护理学》进行考核。
OSCE是《基础护理学》中一种可靠且有效的评估工具。同时,它能激发学生的批判性思维,提升学生的沟通能力。从护理教育伊始就持续应用OSCE,可能对临床实践表现也有一定潜在影响。