• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of the grade of CIN in colposcopically directed biopsies with that in outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens--a retrospective review.

作者信息

Lee K E, Koh C F, Watt W F

机构信息

Department of Gynaecologic Oncology & Urogynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 1999 Nov;40(11):694-6.

PMID:10709407
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that LEEP should be the standard for the diagnosis of cervical dysplasia, rather than colposcopically directed biopsy as traditionally so, since it is both diagnostic and therapeutic.

PATIENTS

Seventy-eight patients who underwent LEEP at the Gynaecological Cancer Centre, KK Hospital from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1997 for cervical dysplasia diagnosed by colposcopically directed biopsy were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 40.3 years (SD 8.4), with 78.2% of them with CIN I or CIN II. The mean operating time was 11.8 minutes (SD 4.9) and 53.8% (42/78) were given prophylactic antibiotics, with the only complication being moderate postoperative haemorrhage in 3.8% (3/78). The mean follow-up period was 19.1 months (SD 9.3) with the cure rate being 97.4% (76/78).

RESULTS

Only half of the patients had corresponding histologies on biopsy and LEEP, with 28.2% (22/78) undergraded and 21.8% (17/78) overgraded.

CONCLUSION

Significant discrepancies may be found between the results of colposcopically directed biopsy and loop excision, and LEEP, which is safe and effective may be the choice procedure for the diagnosis of cervical dysplasia.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of the grade of CIN in colposcopically directed biopsies with that in outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens--a retrospective review.
Singapore Med J. 1999 Nov;40(11):694-6.
2
[The accuracy of diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with colposcopically directed biopsy].[阴道镜引导下活检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的准确性]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Feb 7;86(5):303-6.
3
Predictors of Absent High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Specimens of Patients with Colposcopic Directed Biopsy-Confirmed High-Grade CIN.阴道镜引导活检确诊为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者的环形电切术标本中高级别CIN缺失的预测因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):849-854. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.849.
4
Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?诊断性环形电切术治疗差异:术前因素能否预测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的存在?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Apr;11(2):69-72. doi: 10.1097/01.lgt.0000244072.21246.04.
5
Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的评估与阴道镜下活检和环形电切术(LEEP)的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;286(6):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
6
Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.细胞学高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者阴道镜指导下活检与宫颈环形电切术之间的组织病理学差异。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;31(2):e13. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e13. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Discrepancies between biopsy-based and excision-based grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the important role of time between excision and biopsy.基于活检和基于切除的宫颈上皮内瘤变分级之间的差异:切除与活检之间时间的重要作用。
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015 May;34(3):221-7. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000152.
8
Outpatient procedures for cervical dysplasia: a 3 year review of laser vaporisation and LEEP.
Med J Malaysia. 1999 Mar;54(1):47-51.
9
'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.对于细胞学检查为高级别鳞状上皮内病变的女性,采用leep锥切术的“即见即治”方案是一种安全且节省时间的手术。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1140-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340701505267.
10
The use of colposcopic punch biopsy in the management of abnormal cervical cytology: a 5-year retrospective audit.阴道镜下活检在宫颈细胞学异常管理中的应用:一项5年回顾性审计
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jan;39(1):110-114. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1468740. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Large Retrospective Study of 12714 Cases of LEEP Conization Focusing on Cervical Cancer That Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy Failed to Detect.一项针对 12714 例 LEEP 锥切术的大型回顾性研究,重点关注阴道镜指导下活检未能检测到的宫颈癌。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 30;2018:5138232. doi: 10.1155/2018/5138232. eCollection 2018.
2
Quality of tissue from punch biopsy forceps vs. round loop electrode in colposcopically directed biopsy: a randomized controlled trial.阴道镜引导活检中活检钳与环形电切环取材的组织质量比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;29(4):e52. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e52. Epub 2018 Mar 12.