Segalowitz S J
Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Brain Lang. 2000 Feb 1;71(2):337-43. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2283.
Tallal (1999) defends an earlier presentation of 160 variables predicting classification of 59 children for specific language impairment (SLI) from the statistical criticisms of Zhang and Tomblin (1998). I present here 3 additional reasons why it is wrong to conclude from Tallal's original 1985 analysis and presentation that it is specifically temporal processing variables that underlie SLI. On the contrary, these data lend no support to this position.
塔拉勒（1999年）针对张和汤布林（1998年）的统计批评，为早期提出的160个变量进行辩护，这些变量用于预测59名儿童的特定语言障碍（SLI）分类。在此，我提出另外三个理由，说明为何从塔拉勒1985年的原始分析和表述中得出是特定的时间加工变量构成了SLI的基础这一结论是错误的。相反，这些数据并不支持这一观点。
