Suppr超能文献

成年患者七氟烷麻醉的维持与恢复特征。与异氟烷的多中心随机对照研究。

Maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anaesthesia in adult patients. A multicenter, randomized comparison with isoflurane.

作者信息

Ranieri R, Martinelli G, Pagani I, Della Casa P, Zappala V, Pittoni G, Casati A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 1998 Sep;64(9 Suppl 3):11-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical investigation was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane during maintenance of and recovery from general anaesthesia in adult patients.

METHODS

With the approval of the Ethical Committee and the patient informed consent, 143 ASA physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years, were randomized in order to receive either isoflurane (n = 71) or sevoflurane (n = 72) as the main general anaesthetic. After an oral diazepam (0.1-0.2 mg kg-1) and atropine (0.007-0.01 mg kg-1) premedication and a standardized intravenous induction, general anaesthesia was maintained by adjusting the end-tidal concentrations of the inhalational agent for the maintainance of cardiovascular stability. At the end of surgery the anaesthetic vapours were discontinued, and the neuromuscular block was reversed; the following times were recorded: time of eyes opening, time of command response and suitability for discharge from the recovery area. The occurrence of any untoward event was also recorded. Preoperatively and 24 hr after surgery, blood was collected in order to assess renal an hepatic functions.

RESULTS

No differences in demography, duration of surgery, exposure to the inhalational agent and haemodynamic effects were observed between the two groups. Patients receiving sevoflurane showed shorter times for the achievement of extubation (median: 9 min versus 13 min, p = 0.002), eyes opening (median: 10 min versus 13 min, p = 0.002), command response (11 min versus 15 min, p = 0.002) and suitability for discharge from recovery room (median: 19 min versus 22 min, p < 0.05) than those receiving isofluorane. No intra- and intergroup differences were observed in pre- and post-operative laboratory testing of renal and hepatic function.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that sevoflurane, when compared to isoflurane, provides a similarly safe maintenance but allows for a more rapid emergence from general anaesthesia.

摘要

背景

本多中心、前瞻性、随机临床研究的目的是比较七氟醚和异氟醚在成年患者全身麻醉维持期及苏醒期的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

经伦理委员会批准并获得患者知情同意后,将143例年龄在18 - 65岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I - II级的患者随机分组,分别接受异氟醚(n = 71)或七氟醚(n = 72)作为主要全身麻醉药。在口服地西泮(0.1 - 0.2 mg·kg⁻¹)和阿托品(0.007 - 0.01 mg·kg⁻¹)进行术前用药并采用标准化静脉诱导后,通过调整吸入麻醉药的呼气末浓度维持全身麻醉,以保持心血管稳定。手术结束时停用麻醉蒸气,并逆转神经肌肉阻滞;记录以下时间:睁眼时间、指令反应时间和从恢复区转出的适宜时间。还记录任何不良事件的发生情况。术前及术后24小时采集血液,以评估肾功能和肝功能。

结果

两组在人口统计学、手术时间、吸入麻醉药暴露时间和血流动力学效应方面均未观察到差异。接受七氟醚的患者在拔管时间(中位数:9分钟对13分钟,p = 0.002)、睁眼时间(中位数:10分钟对13分钟,p = 0.002)、指令反应时间(11分钟对15分钟,p = 0.002)和从恢复室转出的适宜时间(中位数:19分钟对22分钟,p < 0.05)方面均短于接受异氟醚的患者。在术前和术后肾功能和肝功能的实验室检测中,未观察到组内和组间差异。

讨论

我们得出结论,与异氟醚相比,七氟醚在维持麻醉时同样安全,但能使患者从全身麻醉中更快苏醒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验