Duarte G, Vaz-Velho M, Capell C, Gibbs P
Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1999 Nov 15;52(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00121-x.
Four secondary enrichment protocols (conventional methods: UVM II, Fraser 24 h and Fraser 48 h: Impedimetric method: Listeria electrical detection medium) were studied for their ability to isolate Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes from fish and environmental samples collected along the processing chain of cold-smoked fish. From all methods, Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes were respectively present in 56 and 34 of 315 samples analysed. Fraser broth incubated for 48 h gave the fewest false negative Listeria spp. results [4/56; (7.1%)], but concurrently only 15/34 (44.1%) samples were correctly identified as containing L. monocytogenes, Listeria electrical detection (LED) medium detected only 36/56 (64.3%) Listeria spp. positive samples. Despite this lower isolation rate, LED identified 20/34 (58.8%) L. monocytogenes positive samples correctly and gave fewer false positive results. The overall conclusion was that more than one isolation method is needed to accurately estimate L. monocytogenes contamination rates.
研究了四种二次富集方案(传统方法:UVM II、Fraser 24小时和Fraser 48小时;阻抗法:李斯特菌电检测培养基)从冷熏鱼加工链沿线采集的鱼类和环境样本中分离李斯特菌属和单核细胞增生李斯特菌的能力。在所有方法中,分析的315个样本中分别有56个和34个样本存在李斯特菌属和单核细胞增生李斯特菌。培养48小时的Fraser肉汤产生的李斯特菌属假阴性结果最少[4/56;(7.1%)],但同时只有15/34(44.1%)的样本被正确鉴定为含有单核细胞增生李斯特菌,李斯特菌电检测(LED)培养基仅检测到36/56(64.3%)的李斯特菌属阳性样本。尽管分离率较低,但LED正确鉴定了20/34(58.8%)的单核细胞增生李斯特菌阳性样本,且假阳性结果较少。总体结论是,需要一种以上的分离方法来准确估计单核细胞增生李斯特菌的污染率。