Sawchenko P E, Li H Y, Ericsson A
Laboratory of Neuronal Structure and Function, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Prog Brain Res. 2000;122:61-78. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62131-7.
The results of recent studies support a partitioning of stress models into at least two basic classes. While these have been referred to as 'systemic' and 'neurogenic', we would suggest that the terms interoceptive and exteroceptive, respectively, are more apt descriptors. This is based on the similarities in the overall patterns of activational responses seen as a consequence of exposure to a range of perturbations in the internal versus external environments. While stressors of each class may share in common such fundamental features as a capacity to enlist certain PVH effector populations and medullary catecholamine-containing neurons, both the capacity to involve specific output neuron classes and the dependence of hypothalamic effects on the integrity of aminergic afferents in at least some interoceptive and exteroceptive models, are clearly differential. The available evidence suggests that interoceptive stress effects on PVH effector populations may be conceived essentially as simple reflex responses, mediated at a subcortical level by cell groups and associated circumventricular organs that comprise the core of a system involved in the processing of visceral sensory information. Based on the general pattern of acute footshock-induced Fos expression and commonalities of cellular activation profiles seen in this and other acute exteroceptive paradigms, it seems a reasonable assumption that pathways that convey somatosensory/nociceptive information to the PVH are apt to mediate adaptive visceromotor responses in these models. Multiple candidates for such roles have been identified at various levels of what may be viewed as the ascent of the spinothalamic pathway through the brainstem and thalamus, and on through the limbic forebrain and hypothalamus. Dissecting the relative contributions of these in determining PVH output will speak to important conceptual issues concerning the extent to which the affective and visceromotor responses to exteroceptive stressors are organized, and the level(s) at which these different avenues of emotional expression may be integrated.
近期研究结果支持将应激模型至少分为两个基本类别。虽然这些类别被称为“全身性”和“神经源性”,但我们认为分别用内感受性和外感受性这两个术语来描述更为恰当。这是基于在暴露于一系列内部和外部环境扰动后所观察到的激活反应总体模式的相似性。虽然每类应激源可能具有一些共同的基本特征,如能够募集某些室旁核效应细胞群和含髓质儿茶酚胺的神经元,但在至少一些内感受性和外感受性模型中,涉及特定输出神经元类别的能力以及下丘脑效应对应胺能传入纤维完整性的依赖性显然是不同的。现有证据表明,内感受性应激对室旁核效应细胞群的影响基本上可被视为简单的反射反应,由构成参与内脏感觉信息处理系统核心的细胞群和相关室周器官在皮层下水平介导。基于急性足部电击诱导的Fos表达的一般模式以及在此和其他急性外感受性范式中观察到的细胞激活谱的共性,似乎有一个合理的假设,即在这些模型中,将躯体感觉/伤害性信息传递到室旁核的通路易于介导适应性内脏运动反应。在可被视为脊髓丘脑束通过脑干和丘脑上升,并继续通过边缘前脑和下丘脑的各个水平上,已经确定了多个可能起这种作用的候选者。剖析这些因素在决定室旁核输出方面的相对贡献,将涉及到重要的概念性问题,即对外感受性应激源的情感和内脏运动反应在多大程度上是有组织的,以及这些不同情感表达途径可能在哪个水平上整合。