Brod S A, Khan M, Nelson L D, Decuir B, Malone M, Henninger E
Department of Neurology and the Multiple Sclerosis Research Group, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 77225, USA.
J Immunother. 2000 Mar-Apr;23(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200003000-00008.
Ingested type I interferon (IFN) suppresses clinical relapse in murine chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), inhibits clinical attacks more effectively than subcutaneous doses, and decreases the adoptive transfer of EAE. To determine whether splenocytes from IFN-fed donors were "suppressor-like" populations, donor SJL/J mice were immunized and fed with mock IFN-alpha or with IFN-alpha every other day for at least 4 weeks after initial clinical attack. Recipients of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells from mock IFN-alpha-fed donors showed no clinical improvement of clinical disease compared with actively immunized controls. In contrast, recipients of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells from IFN-alpha-fed donors showed decreased clinical disease compared with recipients of mock IFN-alpha-fed CD8+ T cells. To evaluate the mechanism of protection by donor CD8+ T cells and to determine if ingested IFN-alpha activates natural immunomodulatory cell populations, the authors used the acute EAE model and naïve-fed donor animals as sources of T cells and CD8+ T cells. Con A-activated spleen T cells from naïve nonimmunized mock IFN-alpha-fed donors inhibited actively induced disease and showed decreased recipient TNF-alpha secretion compared with recipients of T cells from mock IFN-fed mice. Donor activated spleen CD8+ T cells from naïve nonimmunized IFN-alpha-fed animals suppressed actively induced EAE in recipients and showed decreased IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha proinflammatory secretion. Decreased recipient TNF-alpha secretion correlates best with the disease protection from IFN-fed T and CD8+ T cells.
摄入的I型干扰素(IFN)可抑制小鼠慢性实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE)的临床复发,比皮下给药更有效地抑制临床发作,并减少EAE的过继转移。为了确定来自摄入IFN的供体的脾细胞是否为“抑制样”群体,在初次临床发作后,对供体SJL/J小鼠进行免疫,并每隔一天喂食模拟IFN-α或IFN-α,持续至少4周。与主动免疫的对照组相比,接受来自喂食模拟IFN-α供体的过继转移CD8⁺T细胞的受体在临床疾病方面没有改善。相比之下,与接受喂食模拟IFN-α的CD8⁺T细胞的受体相比,接受来自喂食IFN-α供体的过继转移CD8⁺T细胞的受体的临床疾病有所减轻。为了评估供体CD8⁺T细胞的保护机制,并确定摄入的IFN-α是否激活天然免疫调节细胞群体,作者使用急性EAE模型和未免疫的喂食供体动物作为T细胞和CD8⁺T细胞的来源。与接受来自喂食模拟IFN小鼠的T细胞的受体相比,来自未免疫的喂食模拟IFN-α供体的Con A激活的脾T细胞抑制了主动诱导的疾病,并显示受体TNF-α分泌减少。来自未免疫喂食IFN-α动物的供体激活的脾CD8⁺T细胞抑制了受体中主动诱导的EAE,并显示IFN-γ和TNF-α促炎分泌减少。受体TNF-α分泌减少与来自喂食IFN的T细胞和CD8⁺T细胞的疾病保护最相关。