Suppr超能文献

无牙上颌骨中固定或可摘种植体支持式修复体的治疗效果。第二部分:临床发现。

Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part II: clinical findings.

作者信息

Zitzmann N U, Marinello C P

机构信息

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):434-42. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70038-2.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

There is a widespread belief that maxillary overdenture prostheses are associated with a higher frequency of complications and require more maintenance than fixed implant prostheses.

PURPOSE

This prospective clinical study compared the treatment outcomes of fixed and removable implant-supported restorations in the edentulous maxilla with the main emphasis on the clinician's point of view.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients were treated with fixed screw-retained implant prostheses (group 1), and 10 patients were treated with removable implant-supported overdentures (group 2) in the edentulous maxilla. Recall was scheduled at 6-month intervals to investigate the prosthodontic treatment outcomes, including implant survival, prosthesis time until retreatment, and maintenance issues. Clinical parameters gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), the clinical attachment level, and radiographic marginal bone levels measured, along with any biologic and mechanical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients were followed over a mean period of 39 months (SD=7; group 1) and 27 months (SD=10; group 2) after implant placement. Cumulative implant survival was 97.6% for group 1 and 94.4% for group 2 after an 18-month observation period. The mean time until retreatment after prostheses insertion was 23.4 months for group 1 and 19.8 months for group 2 (n.s.). In both groups, the increase over time in the radiographically investigated bone level was found to be significant. The indices given for the mucosal health and oral hygiene status (GI and PI) were highly correlated in both groups at each recall appointment, but no significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

In groups 1 and 2, comparable prosthodontic treatment outcomes were achieved. The majority of mechanical complications could be managed chairside during recall visits and did not require additional appointments, so that the time and costs involved in providing maintenance were kept down.

摘要

问题陈述

人们普遍认为,上颌覆盖义齿修复体的并发症发生率较高,且比固定种植义齿需要更多的维护。

目的

本前瞻性临床研究比较了无牙上颌中固定和可摘种植支持修复体的治疗效果,主要从临床医生的角度进行研究。

材料与方法

10例患者采用固定螺丝固位种植义齿修复(第1组),10例患者采用可摘种植支持覆盖义齿修复(第2组),均用于无牙上颌。每隔6个月进行复诊,以调查修复治疗效果,包括种植体存留率、修复体至再次治疗的时间以及维护问题。记录临床参数牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、临床附着水平、影像学检查的边缘骨水平,以及任何生物学和机械并发症。

结果

种植体植入后,第1组患者平均随访39个月(标准差=7),第2组患者平均随访27个月(标准差=10)。经过18个月的观察期后,第1组种植体的累积存留率为97.6%,第2组为94.4%。第1组修复体植入至再次治疗的平均时间为23.4个月,第2组为19.8个月(无统计学差异)。在两组中,影像学检查发现的骨水平随时间均显著增加。在每次复诊时,两组黏膜健康和口腔卫生状况指标(GI和PI)高度相关,但第1组和第2组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

第1组和第2组获得了可比的修复治疗效果。大多数机械并发症可在复诊时在椅旁处理,无需额外预约,从而降低了维护所需的时间和成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验