Klein D, Bugl B, Günzburg W H, Salmons B
Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Gene Ther. 2000 Mar;7(6):458-63. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301112.
Transduction efficiency can be easily monitored during pre-clinical trials by inclusion of marker genes. However, the use of such marker genes should be avoided in the final clinical gene therapy application since their products are often immunogenic, making it difficult to monitor transduction, especially if the vector is applied in vivo. In these cases PCR-based methods like the real-time PCR might provide a powerful tool to estimate biodistribution. To investigate the accuracy of this method, we have developed and tested a real-time PCR assay for the quantification of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene and compared the results with transduction efficiencies estimated by FACS analysis. Although our real-time PCR assay itself was characterized by a high precision over a wide dynamic range of quantification, significant differences in the transduction efficiency compared with FACS data were initially observed. Accurate determination could only be achieved using an optimized multiplex real-time PCR assay, which allows the simultaneous calculation of cell number and EGFP copy number in the same tube. In view of future needs for methods allowing precise and accurate analysis of biodistribution in gene therapy trials, our data highlight the necessity critically to check both parameters in the implemented assay.
在临床前试验期间,通过纳入标记基因可以轻松监测转导效率。然而,在最终的临床基因治疗应用中应避免使用此类标记基因,因为它们的产物往往具有免疫原性,这使得监测转导变得困难,特别是当载体在体内应用时。在这些情况下,基于PCR的方法(如实时光定量PCR)可能提供一个强大的工具来估计生物分布。为了研究该方法的准确性,我们开发并测试了一种用于定量增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)基因的实时光定量PCR检测方法,并将结果与通过流式细胞术分析估计的转导效率进行了比较。尽管我们的实时光定量PCR检测方法本身在广泛的定量动态范围内具有高精度,但最初观察到与流式细胞术数据相比,转导效率存在显著差异。只有使用优化的多重实时光定量PCR检测方法才能实现准确测定,该方法允许在同一管中同时计算细胞数量和EGFP拷贝数。鉴于未来对能够在基因治疗试验中精确准确分析生物分布的方法的需求,我们的数据强调了在实施的检测中严格检查这两个参数的必要性。