• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估氟哌利多在急性躁动性脑损伤患者中的应用。

Evaluating the usage of droperidol in acutely agitated persons with brain injury.

作者信息

Stanislav S W, Childs A

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2000 Mar;14(3):261-5. doi: 10.1080/026990500120736.

DOI:10.1080/026990500120736
PMID:10759043
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intramuscular droperidol to other intramuscularly administered agents used in the management of acutely agitated patients. Twenty-seven inpatients with a history of brain injury were prospectively monitored over a period of 2 months. Data collected for each episode of agitation include: dose, number of doses, time to achieve an adequate response or calming effect, post-episodic functioning, treatment-emergent side effects, and other patient demographics. A retrospective medical records review was also performed on the same cohort, to compare clinical outcomes associated with other intramuscular agents previously used for acute agitation. Time to achieve calming was significantly shorter with intramuscular droperidol (mean = 27.0 minutes) compared to intramuscular haloperidol, lorazepam, or diphenhydramine (group mean = 36.2 minutes, p = 0.02). Of the three comparative agents, the time to achieve calming was the fastest with lorazepam (mean = 35.0 minutes), and slower with diphenhydramine (mean = 42.6 minutes) and haloperidol (mean = 43.0 minutes). Single doses of droperidol controlled agitation more frequently than did single doses of comparative agents, and there was less post-episodic sedation with droperidol following release from seclusion or restraints. Both groups were similar in regard to the incidence of treatment-emergent events. This data represents the first published experience supporting the effectiveness of droperidol in reducing acute agitation in persons with brain injury. Follow-up studies with prospective, double-blind, parallel treatment groups should be performed to validate these preliminary findings.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较肌肉注射氟哌利多与其他用于治疗急性躁动患者的肌肉注射药物的有效性和安全性。对27例有脑损伤病史的住院患者进行了为期2个月的前瞻性监测。收集的每次躁动发作的数据包括:剂量、给药次数、达到充分反应或镇静效果的时间、发作后功能、治疗中出现的副作用以及其他患者人口统计学信息。还对同一队列进行了回顾性病历审查,以比较与先前用于急性躁动的其他肌肉注射药物相关的临床结果。与肌肉注射氟哌啶醇相比,肌肉注射氟哌利多达到镇静的时间显著缩短(平均 = 27.0分钟),而肌肉注射氟哌啶醇、劳拉西泮或苯海拉明(组平均 = 36.2分钟,p = 0.02)。在三种对比药物中,劳拉西泮达到镇静的时间最快(平均 = 35.0分钟),苯海拉明(平均 = 42.6分钟)和氟哌啶醇(平均 = 43.0分钟)较慢。单剂量氟哌利多比单剂量对比药物更频繁地控制躁动,并且在解除隔离或约束后,氟哌利多引起的发作后镇静较少。两组在治疗中出现的事件发生率方面相似。这些数据代表了首次发表的支持氟哌利多在减少脑损伤患者急性躁动方面有效性的经验。应进行前瞻性、双盲、平行治疗组的随访研究以验证这些初步发现。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the usage of droperidol in acutely agitated persons with brain injury.评估氟哌利多在急性躁动性脑损伤患者中的应用。
Brain Inj. 2000 Mar;14(3):261-5. doi: 10.1080/026990500120736.
2
Prehospital Agitation and Sedation Trial (PhAST): A Randomized Control Trial of Intramuscular Haloperidol versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Sedation of the Agitated or Violent Patient in the Prehospital Environment.院前躁动与镇静试验(PhAST):一项关于肌肉注射氟哌啶醇与肌肉注射咪达唑仑用于院前环境中躁动或暴力患者镇静的随机对照试验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):491-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004999. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Rescue Sedation When Treating Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department With Intramuscular Antipsychotics.急诊科使用肌内注射抗精神病药物治疗急性激越时的救援镇静
J Emerg Med. 2019 May;56(5):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Prospective study of haloperidol plus lorazepam versus droperidol plus midazolam for the treatment of acute agitation in the emergency department.急诊科使用氟哌啶醇加劳拉西泮与氟哌利多加咪达唑仑治疗急性躁动的前瞻性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 May;55:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Randomized Double-blind Trial of Intramuscular Droperidol, Ziprasidone, and Lorazepam for Acute Undifferentiated Agitation in the Emergency Department.肌肉注射氟哌啶醇、齐拉西酮和劳拉西泮治疗急诊科急性未分化激越的随机双盲试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;28(4):421-434. doi: 10.1111/acem.14124. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Risperidone liquid concentrate and oral lorazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol and intramuscular lorazepam for treatment of psychotic agitation.利培酮浓缩液与口服劳拉西泮对比肌肉注射氟哌啶醇与肌肉注射劳拉西泮治疗精神病性激越的疗效
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;62(3):153-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0303.
7
Chemical restraint for the agitated patient in the emergency department: lorazepam versus droperidol.
J Emerg Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;16(4):567-73. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00045-6.
8
Comparison of droperidol and haloperidol for use by paramedics: assessment of safety and effectiveness.护理人员使用氟哌利多和氟哌啶醇的比较:安全性和有效性评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):375-80. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864353. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
9
Calming versus sedative effects of intramuscular olanzapine in agitated patients.肌内注射奥氮平对躁动患者的镇静与安定作用比较
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 May;21(3):192-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(02)42249-8.
10
Naturalistic study of intramuscular ziprasidone versus conventional agents in agitated elderly patients: retrospective findings from a psychiatric emergency service.肌内注射齐拉西酮与传统药物治疗老年躁动患者的自然主义研究:来自精神科急诊服务的回顾性研究结果
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):240-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Current and Potential Pharmacologic Therapies for Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤的现有及潜在药物治疗方法
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Jul 6;15(7):838. doi: 10.3390/ph15070838.
2
Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury.中风和创伤性脑损伤患者精神障碍的管理
Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;64(Suppl 2):S344-S354. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_34_22. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Pharmacological interventions for agitated behaviours in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
颅脑损伤后激越行为的药物干预:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e029604. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029604.
4
Spontaneous recovery of traumatic brain injury-induced functional deficits is not hindered by daily administration of lorazepam.每天服用劳拉西泮不会阻碍创伤性脑损伤所致功能缺陷的自发恢复。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Feb 26;339:215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.039. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
5
Pharmacological management of acute agitation.急性激越的药物治疗
Drugs. 2005;65(9):1207-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565090-00003.