Ahmed H E, White P F, Craig W F, Hamza M A, Ghoname E S, Gajraj N M
Eugene McDermott Center for Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235-9068, USA.
Headache. 2000 Apr;40(4):311-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00046.x.
To evaluate the short-term effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in the management of three types of chronic headache.
Traditional electroanalgesic therapies have been reported to be effective in the management of acute headache symptoms. However, no controlled studies have been performed in patients with chronic headache.
Thirty patients with either tension headache, migraine, or posttraumatic headache symptoms of at least 6 months' duration were randomized to receive PENS (needles with electricity) or "needles alone" according to a crossover study design. All treatments were administered for 30 minutes, three times a week for 2 consecutive weeks with 1 week off between the two different treatments. For the PENS treatments, an alternating electrical stimulation frequency of 15 and 30 Hz was used. Pain, activity, and sleep scores were assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale, with 0 corresponding to the best and 10 to the worst, during the 48-hour period prior to the beginning of the two treatments, immediately before and after each treatment session, and 48 hours after completing each treatment modality.
Compared with the needles alone, PENS therapy was significantly more effective in decreasing the overall VAS pain scores for tension-type headache, migraine and posttraumatic headache (58%, 59%, and 52% versus 20%, 15%, and 20%, respectively). Similarly, PENS therapy produced greater improvement in the patients' physical activity (41% to 58% for PENS versus 11% to 21% for needles only) and quality of sleep (41% to 48% for PENS versus 12% to 20% for needles only). However, there were no differences in the pattern of the response to PENS therapy among the three headache groups.
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be a useful complementary therapy to analgesic and antimigraine drugs for the short-term management of headache. Interestingly, the analgesic response to PENS therapy appears to be independent of the origin of the headache symptoms.
评估经皮电神经刺激(PENS)对三种类型慢性头痛治疗的短期效果。
据报道,传统电镇痛疗法对急性头痛症状的治疗有效。然而,尚未对慢性头痛患者进行对照研究。
根据交叉研究设计,将30例患有紧张性头痛、偏头痛或创伤后头痛且症状持续至少6个月的患者随机分为接受PENS(带电针)或“单纯针疗”两组。所有治疗均持续30分钟,每周3次,连续2周,两种不同治疗之间休息1周。对于PENS治疗,使用15和30Hz的交替电刺激频率。在两种治疗开始前的48小时内、每次治疗前和治疗后立即以及完成每种治疗方式后的48小时,使用10厘米视觉模拟量表评估疼痛、活动和睡眠评分,0表示最佳,10表示最差。
与单纯针疗相比,PENS疗法在降低紧张型头痛、偏头痛和创伤后头痛的总体视觉模拟量表疼痛评分方面显著更有效(分别为58%、59%和52%,而单纯针疗分别为20%、15%和20%)。同样,PENS疗法在改善患者身体活动(PENS为41%至58%,单纯针疗为11%至21%)和睡眠质量(PENS为41%至48%,单纯针疗为12%至20%)方面效果更佳。然而,三个头痛组对PENS疗法的反应模式没有差异。
经皮电神经刺激似乎是一种对镇痛和抗偏头痛药物有用的辅助疗法,可用于头痛的短期治疗。有趣的是,对PENS疗法的镇痛反应似乎与头痛症状的起源无关。