Suppr超能文献

克拉霉素或利福布汀单独或联合用于艾滋病患者鸟分枝杆菌复合群疾病的一级预防:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。艾滋病临床试验组196/特里·贝恩艾滋病临床研究社区项目009方案团队。

Clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination for primary prophylaxis of Mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients with AIDS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group 196/Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS 009 Protocol Team.

作者信息

Benson C A, Williams P L, Cohn D L, Becker S, Hojczyk P, Nevin T, Korvick J A, Heifets L, Child C C, Lederman M M, Reichman R C, Powderly W G, Notario G F, Wynne B A, Hafner R

机构信息

Rush Medical College/Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2000 Apr;181(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1086/315380. Epub 2000 Apr 13.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and rifabutin alone and in combination for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease were compared in 1178 patients with AIDS who had < or =100 CD4 T cells/microL in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MAC disease occurred in 9%, 15%, and 7% of those randomized to clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination, respectively; time-adjusted event rates per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 6.3 (4.2-8.3), 10.5 (7.8-13.2), and 4. 7 (2.9-6.5). Risk of MAC disease was reduced by 44% with clarithromycin (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84; P=.005) and by 57% with combination therapy (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69; P=. 0003), versus rifabutin. Combination therapy was not more effective than clarithromycin (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.31; P=.36). Of those in whom clarithromycin or combination therapy failed, 29% and 27% of MAC isolates, respectively, were resistant to clarithromycin. There were no survival differences. Clarithromycin and combination therapy were more effective than rifabutin for prevention of MAC disease, but combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects (31%; P<.001).

摘要

在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,对1178例CD4 T细胞计数≤100/μL的艾滋病患者比较了克拉霉素和利福布汀单独及联合使用预防鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)病的疗效和安全性。随机接受克拉霉素或利福布汀单药治疗或联合治疗的患者中,MAC病的发生率分别为9%、15%和7%;每100患者年的时间调整事件发生率(95%置信区间[CI])分别为6.3(4.2 - 8.3)、10.5(7.8 - 13.2)和4.7(2.9 - 6.5)。与利福布汀相比,克拉霉素使MAC病风险降低了44%(风险比[RR],0.56;95% CI,0.37 - 0.84;P = 0.005),联合治疗使风险降低了57%(RR,0.43;95% CI,0.27 - 0.69;P = 0.0003)。联合治疗并不比利福布汀更有效(RR,0.79;95% CI,0.48 - 1.31;P = 0.36)。在克拉霉素或联合治疗失败的患者中,分别有29%和27%的MAC分离株对克拉霉素耐药。生存情况无差异。克拉霉素和联合治疗在预防MAC病方面比利福布汀更有效,但联合治疗的不良反应更多(31%;P<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验