Siedentop Berit, Kachalov Viacheslav N, Witzany Christopher, Egger Matthias, Kouyos Roger D, Bonhoeffer Sebastian
Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elife. 2024 Dec 20;13:RP93740. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93740.
Under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics.
We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE, and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to 24 November 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. Patients were considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials' risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.
42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (=77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions.
The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.
Support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 310030B_176401 (SB, BS, CW), grant 32FP30-174281 (ME), grant 324730_207957 (RDK)) and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, cooperative agreement AI069924 (ME)) is gratefully acknowledged.
抗生素联合治疗在何种情况下会减缓而非加速耐药性演变,目前尚未得到充分理解。我们研究了联合使用抗生素对不同细菌病原体和抗生素在患者体内耐药性发展的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和美国国立医学图书馆生物医学数据库(PubMed),以查找从数据库创建至2022年11月24日发表的(准)随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入比较使用不同数量抗生素进行治疗的试验。如果在随访培养中检测到基线培养中不存在的耐药菌(根据研究作者的定义),则认为患者获得了耐药性。我们使用随机效应模型合并结果,并进行了Meta回归和分层分析。使用Cochrane工具评估试验的偏倚风险。
42项试验符合纳入标准,其中29项(包括5054名患者)符合统计分析要求。在大多数试验中,耐药性发展并非主要结局,且研究的检验效能不足。与对照组相比,使用较多抗生素组获得耐药性的合并比值比为1.23(95%可信区间0.68 - 2.25),研究间存在显著异质性(I² = 77%)。我们发现了关于抗生素联合治疗对特定病原体或医疗状况可能产生有益或有害影响的初步证据。
与使用较少抗生素的RCT相比,关于联合使用较多抗生素的证据不足,总体上既可能有益也可能有害。需要有足够检验效能来检测耐药性发展差异的试验或设计良好的观察性研究,以阐明联合治疗对耐药性的影响。
感谢瑞士国家科学基金会(资助编号310030B_176401(SB、BS、CW)、32FP3 – 174281(ME)、324730_207957(RDK))以及美国国立过敏和传染病研究所(NIAID,合作协议AI069924(ME))的支持。