Bornemann A, Anderson L V
Institute of Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Brain Pathol. 2000 Apr;10(2):193-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2000.tb00254.x.
Using immunohistochemistry in diagnosing neuromuscular diseases is meant to enhance the diagnostic yield in two ways. The first application aims at visualizing molecules which are developmentally, neurally, and/or immunologically regulated and not expressed by normal muscle. They are upregulated in pathological conditions and may help assign a given muscular biopsy to one of the main diagnostic entities (muscular dystrophies, inflammatory myopathy, neurogenic atrophy). In the past, muscle-specific molecules with a defined expression pattern during fetal myogenesis served as antigens, with the rationale that the developmental program was switched on in new fibers. Recently, myofibers in diseased muscle are thought of as targets of stimuli which are released by macrophages in muscular dystrophy, by lymphocytes in inflammatory myopathies, or by a lesioned peripheral nerve in neurogenic atrophies. This has somewhat blurred the borders between the diagnostic groups, for certain molecules, e.g. cytokines, may be upregulated after experimental necrotization, denervation, and also in inflammatory myopathies. In the second part of this review we summarise the experiences of a Centre in the North of England that specialises in the diagnosis and clinical support of patients with muscular dystrophy. Emphasis is placed on the use of protein expression to guide mutation analysis, particularly in the limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (a group of diseases that are very difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds alone). We confirm that genetic analysis is essential to corroborate the results of protein analysis in certain conditions (particularly in calpainopathy). However, we conclude that analysing biopsies for abnormal protein expression is very useful in aiding the decision between alternative diagnoses.
在神经肌肉疾病诊断中使用免疫组织化学旨在通过两种方式提高诊断效率。第一种应用旨在可视化那些在发育、神经和/或免疫调节方面受到调控且正常肌肉不表达的分子。它们在病理状态下上调,可能有助于将特定的肌肉活检归类到主要诊断类别之一(肌肉营养不良症、炎性肌病、神经源性萎缩)。过去,在胎儿肌生成过程中具有特定表达模式的肌肉特异性分子用作抗原,其依据是发育程序在新纤维中被开启。最近,患病肌肉中的肌纤维被认为是肌肉营养不良症中巨噬细胞、炎性肌病中淋巴细胞或神经源性萎缩中受损周围神经释放的刺激的靶标。这在一定程度上模糊了诊断组之间的界限,因为某些分子,如细胞因子,在实验性坏死、去神经支配后以及炎性肌病中可能会上调。在本综述的第二部分,我们总结了英格兰北部一个专门从事肌肉营养不良症患者诊断和临床支持的中心的经验。重点在于利用蛋白质表达来指导突变分析,特别是在肢带型肌肉营养不良症(一组仅根据临床依据很难区分的疾病)中。我们证实,在某些情况下(特别是在钙蛋白酶病中),基因分析对于证实蛋白质分析结果至关重要。然而,我们得出结论,分析活检组织中的异常蛋白质表达对于辅助在不同诊断之间做出决策非常有用。