Miller A, Ferguson E, Byrne I
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2000 Mar;70 ( Pt 1):85-96. doi: 10.1348/000709900157985.
Studies of causal attributions within educational contexts have tended to concentrate on academic performance. There have been a smaller number of investigations of teachers' attributions for pupils' behaviour in school.
The present study examines the causal attribution made by pupils for difficult behaviour in classrooms. It reveals the structure of these attributions and serves as a comparison with the teacher studies.
The participants were 105 pupils (52 males and 53 females) in the first year of secondary schooling, all drawn from the same inner city school.
Four initial small group interviews were used to identify a wide range of factors that pupils viewed as being causes of difficult classroom behaviour in the 18 primary schools they had previously attended. A questionnaire was then constructed incorporating items from these discussions and administered to the whole of the year group of pupils, but omitting the participants in the initial group discussions.
The results of a factor analysis indicated that pupils' attributions for misbehaviour at school were best represented by four factors: (1) 'fairness of teacher's actions', (2) 'pupil vulnerability', (3) 'adverse family circumstances' and (4) 'strictness of classroom regime'. While there were no gender differences, pupils saw the 'fairness of teacher's actions' and 'pupil vulnerability' as more significant contributors to pupil misbehaviour than either 'adverse family circumstances' or 'strictness of classroom regime'.
The attributions by pupils for difficult classroom behaviour differ markedly from those obtained in studies of teachers. Policy and practice initiatives which do not attend to conflicting attributional styles are unlikely to succeed in improving levels of pupil behaviour in schools.
教育背景下的因果归因研究往往集中在学业成绩上。对教师对学生在校行为的归因进行调查的数量较少。
本研究考察了学生对课堂上困难行为的因果归因。它揭示了这些归因的结构,并与教师研究进行比较。
参与者是105名中学一年级学生(52名男生和53名女生),均来自同一市中心学校。
最初进行了四次小组访谈,以确定学生认为是他们曾就读的18所小学中课堂困难行为原因的广泛因素。然后构建了一份问卷,纳入了这些讨论中的项目,并发放给整个年级的学生,但不包括最初小组讨论的参与者。
因子分析结果表明,学生对学校不当行为的归因最能由四个因素来体现:(1)“教师行为的公平性”,(2)“学生易受伤害性”,(3)“不利的家庭环境”和(4)“课堂制度的严格性”。虽然没有性别差异,但学生认为“教师行为的公平性”和“学生易受伤害性”比“不利的家庭环境”或“课堂制度的严格性”更能导致学生的不当行为。
学生对课堂困难行为的归因与教师研究中的归因明显不同。不考虑相互冲突的归因方式的政策和实践举措不太可能成功提高学校的学生行为水平。