Halkin A, Weiss AT, Jaffe R, Zahger D
Department of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998 Jul;5(3):183-189. doi: 10.1023/A:1008872424033.
Although coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of death in industrialized countries, the management of patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction varies significantly. The issue of routine arteriography and revascularization following thrombolytic therapy remains controversial despite substantial evidence associating infarct-related artery patency with improved cardiac function and survival. Randomized trials of routine intervention after myocardial infarction have generally failed to demonstrate advantages of this invasive approach but methodological problems limit their application to current practice. High-risk patients should be referred for arteriography. While awaiting definitive trials addressing the influence of routine arteriography on patient survival and its cost effectiveness, the management of other patient groups must be individualized.
尽管冠状动脉疾病仍是工业化国家的主要死因,但急性心肌梗死康复患者的治疗方法差异很大。尽管有大量证据表明梗死相关动脉通畅与改善心脏功能和生存率相关,但溶栓治疗后常规血管造影和血运重建问题仍存在争议。心肌梗死后常规干预的随机试验通常未能证明这种侵入性方法的优势,但方法学问题限制了它们在当前实践中的应用。高危患者应转诊进行血管造影。在等待关于常规血管造影对患者生存率影响及其成本效益的确定性试验期间,其他患者群体的治疗必须个体化。