Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林与华法林预防成功溶栓后再闭塞和复发性缺血的前瞻性安慰剂对照血管造影研究:APRICOT研究结果

Aspirin versus coumadin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after successful thrombolysis: a prospective placebo-controlled angiographic study. Results of the APRICOT Study.

作者信息

Meijer A, Verheugt F W, Werter C J, Lie K I, van der Pol J M, van Eenige M J

机构信息

Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Circulation. 1993 May;87(5):1524-30. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1524.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful coronary thrombolysis involves a risk for reocclusion that cannot be prevented by invasive strategies. Therefore, we studied the effects of three antithrombotic regimens on the angiographic and clinical courses after successful thrombolysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy followed by intravenous heparin were eligible when a patent infarct-related artery was demonstrated at angiography < 48 hours. Three hundred patients were randomized to either 325 mg aspirin daily or placebo with discontinuation of heparin or to Coumadin with continuation of heparin until oral anticoagulation was established (international normalized ratio, 2.8-4.0). After 3 months, in which conservative treatment was intended, vessel patency and ventricular function were reassessed in 248 patients. Reocclusion rates were not significantly different: 25% (23 of 93) with aspirin, 30% (24 of 81) with Coumadin, and 32% (24 of 74) with placebo. Reinfarction was seen in 3% of patients on aspirin, in 8% on Coumadin, and in 11% on placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.025; other comparison, p = NS). Revascularization rate was 6% with aspirin, 13% with Coumadin, and 16% with placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.05; other comparisons, p = NS). Mortality was 2% and did not differ between groups. An event-free clinical course was seen in 93% with aspirin, in 82% with Coumadin, and in 76% with placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.001; aspirin versus Coumadin, p < 0.05). An event-free course without reocclusion was observed in 73% with aspirin, in 63% with Coumadin, and in 59% with placebo (p = NS). An increase of left ventricular ejection fraction was only found in the aspirin group (4.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 months after successful thrombolysis, reocclusion occurred in about 30% of patients, regardless of the use of antithrombotics. Compared with placebo, aspirin significantly reduces reinfarction rate and revascularization rate, improves event-free survival, and better preserves left ventricular function. The efficacy of Coumadin on these end points appears less than that of aspirin. The still-high reocclusion rate emphasizes the need for better antithrombotic therapy in these patients.

摘要

背景

成功的冠状动脉溶栓治疗存在再闭塞风险,而侵入性策略无法预防这种风险。因此,我们研究了三种抗栓治疗方案对成功溶栓后血管造影和临床病程的影响。

方法与结果

静脉溶栓治疗后接受静脉肝素治疗的患者,若在血管造影检查中显示梗死相关动脉在<48小时内通畅,则符合入选标准。300例患者被随机分为三组,分别为每日服用325毫克阿司匹林或安慰剂并停用肝素,或服用香豆素并继续使用肝素直至建立口服抗凝治疗(国际标准化比值,2.8 - 4.0)。在旨在进行保守治疗的3个月后,对248例患者重新评估血管通畅情况和心室功能。再闭塞率无显著差异:阿司匹林组为25%(93例中的23例),香豆素组为30%(81例中的24例),安慰剂组为32%(74例中的24例)。阿司匹林组3%的患者发生再梗死,香豆素组为8%,安慰剂组为11%(阿司匹林组与安慰剂组比较,p < 0.025;其他比较,p = 无显著性差异)。阿司匹林组的血管重建率为6%,香豆素组为13%,安慰剂组为16%(阿司匹林组与安慰剂组比较,p < 0.05;其他比较,p = 无显著性差异)。死亡率为2%,各组之间无差异。阿司匹林组93%的患者临床病程无事件发生,香豆素组为

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验