Mowschenson P M, Critchlow J F, Peppercorn M A
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA.
Arch Surg. 2000 Apr;135(4):463-5; discussion 465-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.4.463.
Avoiding a diverting ileostomy does not influence the long-term overall morbidity and functional outcome of patients after ileoanal pouch operation (IAP).
All patients undergoing IAP were prospectively entered into a database, and those undergoing operation from October 1, 1989, through January 31, 1996, were contacted by mail questionnaire.
Tertiary referral center.
One hundred thirty unselected sequential patients.
The IAP was completed by a stapled method without diverting ileostomy, provided the patient agreed, and there were no other complicating factors.
Need for reoperation, fecal leakage, pouch frequency, ability to defer evacuation, pouchitis, and overall quality of life.
Of 102 patients (78.5%) who initially underwent IAP without diverting ileostomy, 10 (9.8%) developed an anastomotic leak and required a diverting ileostomy. Additional surgery was required in 12 (9.2%) of the 130 patients for bowel obstruction and in 3 (2.3%) for pouch excision. Two patients died of unrelated causes, leaving 125 functioning pouches (96.2%). Questionnaires were completed in 111 (88.8%) of the 125; 75 patients (67.6%) reported perfect continence for gas and stool, 10 patients (9.0%), regular nighttime leakage, and 24 patients (21.6%), occasional fecal leakage. Pouch evacuation frequency (+/-SD) per 24 hours was 7.8+/-2.4 (range, 4-12), and 95.5% of patients could defer pouch evacuation. Of the 111 patients, 42.3% reported pouchitis, with 7.2% receiving long-term antibiotic therapy. Of the patients, 74.8% reported total satisfaction, and 84.7% regarded themselves as being in perfect health.
Long-term outcome after IAP remains favorable with or without diverting ileostomy.
避免行转流性回肠造口术不会影响回肠肛管吻合术(IAP)患者的长期总体发病率和功能结局。
所有接受IAP的患者均被前瞻性纳入数据库,通过邮件问卷联系了1989年10月1日至1996年1月31日期间接受手术的患者。
三级转诊中心。
130例未经挑选的连续患者。
若患者同意且无其他复杂因素,采用吻合器技术完成IAP,不行转流性回肠造口术。
再次手术的必要性、粪便失禁、储袋排便次数、延迟排便的能力、储袋炎及总体生活质量。
102例(78.5%)最初接受IAP且未行转流性回肠造口术的患者中,10例(9.8%)发生吻合口漏并需要行转流性回肠造口术。130例患者中有12例(9.2%)因肠梗阻需要再次手术,3例(2.3%)因切除储袋需要再次手术。2例患者死于无关原因,剩余125个功能正常的储袋(96.2%)。125例患者中有111例(88.8%)完成了问卷调查;75例患者(67.6%)报告气体和粪便完全可控,10例患者(9.0%)有夜间规律性渗漏,24例患者(21.6%)有偶尔的粪便失禁。每24小时储袋排便次数(±标准差)为7.8±2.4(范围4 - 12次),95.5%的患者能够延迟储袋排便。111例患者中,42.3%报告有储袋炎,7.2%接受长期抗生素治疗。74.8%的患者报告总体满意,84.7%的患者认为自己健康状况良好。
无论是否行转流性回肠造口术,IAP后的长期结局均良好。