Longobardi S, Keay N, Ehrnborg C, Cittadini A, Rosén T, Dall R, Boroujerdi M A, Bassett E E, Healy M L, Pentecost C, Wallace J D, Powrie J, Jørgensen J O, Saccà L
Department of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Apr;85(4):1505-12. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.4.6551.
The effects of GH on bone remodeling in healthy adults have not been systematically investigated. An analysis of these effects might provide insights into GH physiology and might yield data useful for the detection of GH doping in sports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of GH administration on biochemical markers of bone and collagen turnover in healthy volunteers. Ninety-nine healthy volunteers of both sexes were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study and assigned to receive either placebo (40 subjects) or recombinant human GH (0.1 IU/kg day in 29 subjects and 0.2 IU/kg x day in 30 subjects). The treatment duration was 28 days, followed by a 56-day wash-out period. The biochemical markers evaluated were the bone formation markers osteocalcin and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, the resorption marker type I collagen telopeptide, and the soft tissue marker procollagen type III. All variables increased on days 21 and 28 in the two active treatment groups vs. levels in both the baseline (P < 0.01) and placebo (P < 0.01) groups. The increment was more pronounced in the 0.2 IU/kg-day group and remained significant on day 84 for procollagen type III (from 0.53 +/- 0.13 to 0.61 +/- 0.14 kU/L; P < 0.02) and osteocalcin (from 12.2 + 2.9 to 14.6 +/- 3.6 UG/L; P < 0.02), whereas levels of C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and type I collagen telopeptide declined after day 42 and were no longer significantly above baseline on day 84 (from 3.9 +/- 1.2 to 5.1 +/-1.5 microg/L and from 174 +/- 60 to 173 +/- 53 microg/L, respectively). Gender-related differences were observed in the study; females were less responsive than males to GH administration with respect to procollagen type III and type I collagen telopeptide (P < 0.001). In conclusion, exogenous GH administration affects the biochemical parameters of bone and collagen turnover in a dose- and gender-dependent manner. As GH-induced modifications of most markers, in particular procollagen type III and osteocalcin, persist after GH withdrawal, they may be suitable markers for detecting GH abuse.
生长激素(GH)对健康成年人骨重塑的影响尚未得到系统研究。分析这些影响可能有助于深入了解GH生理学,并可能产生有助于检测体育赛事中GH兴奋剂使用情况的数据。本研究的目的是评估给予GH对健康志愿者骨和胶原蛋白转换生化标志物的影响。99名健康男女志愿者参加了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,被分配接受安慰剂(40名受试者)或重组人生长激素(29名受试者每日0.1 IU/kg,30名受试者每日0.2 IU/kg)。治疗持续28天,随后是56天的洗脱期。评估的生化标志物包括骨形成标志物骨钙素和I型前胶原C端前肽、吸收标志物I型胶原端肽以及软组织标志物III型前胶原。与基线组(P < 0.01)和安慰剂组(P < 0.01)相比,两个活性治疗组在第21天和第28天所有变量均升高。在0.2 IU/kg·天组中升高更为明显,并且在第84天III型前胶原(从0.53±0.13升至0.61±0.14 kU/L;P < 0.02)和骨钙素(从12.2 + 2.9升至14.6±3.6 UG/L;P < 0.02)仍具有显著差异,而I型前胶原C端前肽和I型胶原端肽水平在第42天后下降,在第84天不再显著高于基线(分别从3.9±1.2降至5.1±1.5 μg/L和从174±60降至173±53 μg/L)。研究中观察到了性别差异;在III型前胶原和I型胶原端肽方面,女性对GH给药的反应低于男性(P < 0.001)。总之,外源性GH给药以剂量和性别依赖的方式影响骨和胶原蛋白转换的生化参数。由于GH诱导的大多数标志物的改变,特别是III型前胶原和骨钙素,在停用GH后仍然存在,它们可能是检测GH滥用的合适标志物。