Oosthuizen M M, Greyling D
Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Redox Rep. 1999;4(6):277-90. doi: 10.1179/135100099101535124.
From a panel of 24 alleged antioxidants the most suitable antioxidants (AO) for use with chemiluminescence (CL) experiments were determined. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), using luminol as the chemiluminescence probe (Lum-CL), was inhibitory only towards O2*- and not HO* or (1)O2. SOD was thus a suitable antioxidant for O2*-, as was tiron. Tiron had advantages, however, since SOD acted as a pro-oxidant in the presence of H2O2 or H2O2/HO* generators. The two most suitable antioxidants for (1)O2 were diphenylisobenzofuran (DBF) and tryptophan, for both Lum and Lucigenin-CL (Luc-CL). Desferrioxamine, with both Lum and Luc-CL, was a very effective scavenger for HO*, but appeared to be an even more effective scavenger for (1)O2. Cysteamine showed the best discrimination between IC50s when the two (1)O2 generators NaOCl/H2O2 and NDPO2 were compared. Cysteamine was, therefore, the only scavenger that was appropriate for studies with hypochlorite. Melatonin, with Lum-CL, was found to be the most suitable scavenger for HO*. Mannitol, the classical AO for HO*, was not suitable when used with CL since it acted as a pro-oxidant. Some of the AOs revealed either calyx- or bell-shaped CL inhibition profiles and presumably, therefore, may act as both pro- or antioxidants at different concentrations. Antioxidants showing these kinds of dual activities should be used with caution in CL studies.