Suppr超能文献

经腹腹腔镜入路技术比较:Optiview可视化套管针与Veress针

Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle.

作者信息

Marcovich R, Del Terzo M A, Wolf J S

机构信息

Section of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0330, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2000 Mar;14(2):175-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2000.14.175.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We retrospectively compared the safety, efficacy, and relative indications of the Optiview visualizing trocar and the Veress needle for obtaining transperitoneal laparoscopic access.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 100 consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures performed by a single surgeon, the Veress needle was used initially in 96 patients. The Optiview was used on 26 occasions: in 4 patients as the initial access attempt, and in 22 patients after the Veress needle had failed. Patient characteristics (age, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, and history of abdominal surgery), success rates, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Access was obtained successfully with the Optiview in 25 of 26 cases (96%), whereas the Veress needle was successful in 72 of 96 (75%; P = 0.02). The Hasson cannula was used successfully after two of the Veress needle failures and the single Optiview failure. Age, BMI, ASA score, and history of abdominal surgery were not associated with access failure. There were no Optiview-related complications. Use of the Hasson cannula was not associated with any complications, but it was difficult to place, leaked gas, or both in two of the three patients. There were four Veress-related access complications (all minor): one colon insufflation, two retroperitoneal hematomas, and one liver laceration.

CONCLUSIONS

As an alternative to the Hasson cannula, the Optiview visualizing trocar is a safe and highly effective method of obtaining transperitoneal laparoscopic access, particularly in those patients in whom difficulty is encountered with the Veress needle. However, the needle is less expensive and, in our experience, has not been associated with significant complications. Because we were unable to determine objective patient characteristics that increase the risk for Veress needle failure, we continue to use it for the first attempts at transperitoneal access in most patients.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性比较了Optiview可视化套管针和Veress针用于获得经腹腹腔镜入路的安全性、有效性及相对适应证。

患者与方法

在由一名外科医生连续进行的100例经腹腹腔镜手术中,96例患者最初使用Veress针。Optiview在26例手术中使用:4例作为初次入路尝试,22例在Veress针失败后使用。比较患者特征(年龄、体重指数[BMI]、美国麻醉医师协会[ASA]评分及腹部手术史)、成功率及并发症。

结果

Optiview在26例中的25例(96%)成功获得入路,而Veress针在96例中的72例成功(75%;P = 0.02)。在Veress针两次失败及Optiview一次失败后,Hasson套管成功使用。年龄、BMI、ASA评分及腹部手术史与入路失败无关。未发生与Optiview相关的并发症。使用Hasson套管未发生任何并发症,但在3例患者中的2例放置困难、漏气或两者皆有。发生4例与Veress针相关的入路并发症(均为轻微并发症):1例结肠充气,2例腹膜后血肿,1例肝撕裂伤。

结论

作为Hasson套管的替代方法,Optiview可视化套管针是获得经腹腹腔镜入路的一种安全且高效的方法,尤其适用于那些使用Veress针遇到困难的患者。然而,Veress针成本较低,且根据我们的经验,未发生严重并发症。由于我们无法确定增加Veress针失败风险的客观患者特征,因此在大多数患者经腹入路的初次尝试中我们仍继续使用它。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验