Weiss M, von Heidenreich P, Finckenstein W, Ebert T, Vogt H
Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Zentralklinikum Augsburg.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000 Mar 31;125(13):383-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024206.
In the majority of cases of gastrointestinal bleeding the site and cause can be determined by gastroscope. If this is unsuccessful, radiological and nuclear-medical tests are available. This study was undertaken to determine the value of scintigraphy in diagnosing of the site of gastrointestinal bleeding.
The data on 155 patients who, between 1984 and 1988, had undergone 161 scintigraphies (with 99mTc-labelled erythrocytes, 5 with 99mTc-Sn colloid) were retrospectively analysed. The results were compared with other diagnostic tests that had been performed, with the definitive diagnosis and, where applicable, the findings at surgery.
78 scintigrams (47%) provided positive results. The site of bleeding had been demonstrated ca. 20 hours after the diagnostic studies had begun. In 47 of the cases the diagnosis was confirmed by additional tests. The intestine was the most common site of bleeding. Localization of the source of bleeding by scintigraphy and other diagnostic tests succeeded in 34 cases, with a 82% concordance between the tests. No bleeding was demonstrated in 88 scintigrams (53%), including all those done with Sn-colloid. In 13 cases the final diagnosis suggested that there had been no previous bleeding and in 43 cases the source of bleeding could not be determined. In 32 scintigraphically negative cases the source of bleeding was demonstrated by other tests. But only 2 of the 13 angiograms and none of the 33 double-contrast studies of the small intestine gave positive results. Among the total number of cases in which bleeding was demonstrated, scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 71%.
Because of the long duration of observation, scintigraphy with 99mTc-labelled erythrocytes proved superior to other diagnostic tests in the demonstration of the bleeding. By localizing the source of bleeding in a definite part of the gastrointestinal tract, scintigraphy points the way to choosing other diagnostic methods or treatment. If the initial endoscopy has failed, scintigraphy, a method of low invasiveness, should be included when further tests are planned.
在大多数胃肠道出血病例中,可通过胃镜确定出血部位及病因。若此方法不成功,还可进行放射学和核医学检查。本研究旨在确定闪烁扫描术在诊断胃肠道出血部位方面的价值。
回顾性分析了1984年至1988年间155例患者接受的161次闪烁扫描术(99mTc标记红细胞扫描156次,99mTc - Sn胶体扫描5次)的数据。将结果与所进行的其他诊断检查结果、最终诊断结果以及(适用时)手术所见进行比较。
78次闪烁扫描(47%)结果为阳性。诊断研究开始后约20小时显示出出血部位。47例患者的诊断通过其他检查得到证实。肠道是最常见的出血部位。闪烁扫描术与其他诊断检查在34例中成功定位了出血源,检查结果的一致性为82%。88次闪烁扫描(53%)未显示出血,包括所有使用Sn胶体进行的扫描。13例最终诊断提示既往无出血,43例无法确定出血源。32例闪烁扫描阴性的病例中,其他检查显示了出血源。但13次血管造影中只有2次、33次小肠双重对比造影均无阳性结果。在显示出血的所有病例中,闪烁扫描术的敏感性为71%。
由于观察时间长,99mTc标记红细胞闪烁扫描术在显示出血方面优于其他诊断检查。通过在胃肠道特定部位定位出血源,闪烁扫描术为选择其他诊断方法或治疗指明了方向。如果初始内镜检查失败,计划进一步检查时应采用闪烁扫描术这种低侵入性方法。