Suppr超能文献

Associations between primary care physician satisfaction and self-reported aspects of utilization management.

作者信息

Kerr E A, Mittman B S, Hays R D, Zemencuk J K, Pitts J, Brook R H

机构信息

Ann Arbor VA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, MI 48113-0170, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):333-49.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between physician-reported utilization management (UM) techniques in capitated physician groups and physician satisfaction with capitated care.

STUDY SETTING

1,138 primary care physicians from 89 California capitated physician groups in 1995.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty percent of physicians (N = 910) responded to a mail survey regarding the UM policies in their groups and their satisfaction with the care they deliver. Physician-reported UM strategies measured included group-mandated preauthorization (number of referrals requiring preauthorization, referral denial rate, and referral turnaround time), group-provided explicit practice guidelines, and group-delivered educational programs regarding capitated care. We also measured two key dimensions of satisfaction with capitated care (multi-item scales): (1) satisfaction with capitated care autonomy and quality, and (2) satisfaction with administrative burden for capitated patients.

EXTRACTION METHODS

We constructed two multivariate linear regression models to examine associations between physician-reported UM strategies and physician satisfaction, controlling for demographic and practice characteristics and adjusting for clustering.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Physician-reported denial rate and turnaround time were significantly negatively associated with capitated care satisfaction. Physicians who reported that their groups provided more guidelines were more satisfied on both dimensions, while physicians who reported that their groups sponsored more educational programs were more satisfied with administrative burden. The number of clinical decisions requiring preauthorization was not significantly associated with either dimension of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians who reported that their groups used UM methods that directly affected their autonomy (high denial rates and long turnaround times) were less satisfied with care for capitated patients. However, a preauthorization policy for referrals or tests was not, in and of itself, associated with satisfaction. Indirect control mechanisms such as guidelines and education were positively associated with satisfaction.

摘要

相似文献

4
Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization?
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Oct 1;123(7):500-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-7-199510010-00004.
5
The influence of gatekeeping and utilization review on patient satisfaction.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 May;14(5):287-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00336.x.
8
Primary care physicians' experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 19;339(21):1516-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392106.
10
German physicians "on strike"--shedding light on the roots of physician dissatisfaction.
Health Policy. 2007 Aug;82(3):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician "out of office" alert: does it work?
Curr Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(3):e176-e179. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3548. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Aligning provider incentives to improve primary healthcare delivery in the United States.
OA Fam Med. 2013 Jun 1;1(1):7. doi: 10.13172/2052-8922-1-1-958.
4
Organizational culture and physician satisfaction with dimensions of group practice.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1150-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00648.x.
5
6
Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):271-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.32127.x.
7
Variations in nurse practitioner use in Veterans Affairs primary care practices.
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):887-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00263.x.
8
Physician discontent: a barometer of change and need for intervention.
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):496-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007496.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Change, consolidation, and competition in health care markets.
J Econ Perspect. 1999 Winter;13(1):141-64. doi: 10.1257/jep.13.1.141.
3
The influence of gatekeeping and utilization review on patient satisfaction.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 May;14(5):287-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00336.x.
4
5
The American health care system--physicians and the changing medical marketplace.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 18;340(7):584-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902183400725.
6
The new medical marketplace: physicians' views.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):139-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.139.
8
Medical professionalism under managed care: the pros and cons of utilization review.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):106-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.106.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验