Suppr超能文献

按人头付费的医生集团中的质量保证。重点在哪里?

Quality assurance in capitated physician groups. Where is the emphasis?

作者信息

Kerr E A, Mittman B S, Hays R D, Leake B, Brook R H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1236-9.

PMID:8849751
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe quality assurance (QA) programs implemented by capitated physician groups; to measure their relative emphasis on monitoring of overuse compared with underuse and monitoring and improving preventive services compared with chronic disease care; and to examine how group characteristics influence QA activity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional questionnaire.

SETTING

A large network-model health maintenance organization in California (133 contracting physician groups).

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-four physician groups (71%) caring for 2.9 million capitated patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported use of quality monitoring and improvement methods.

RESULTS

All capitated physician groups conducted some QA. Groups' QA programs monitored areas subject to overuse, such as cesarean delivery and angioplasty rates, more than areas subject to underuse, such as childhood immunization rates and performance of retinal examinations for diabetic patients (64% vs 43%, P<.001). They monitored underuse of preventive services more than follow-up services for chronic diseases (54% vs 31%, P<.001). Groups also used reminders for preventive services more than they monitored follow-up services for chronic diseases (26% vs 15%, P<.01). Physician group characteristics independently associated with higher overall QA activity were greater number of years in existence, higher profitability, and capitated care penetration.

CONCLUSION

Capitation places a large share of responsibility for QA in the hands of physician groups, but not all aspects of QA are being equally addressed. The emphasis on overuse may result from financial incentives inherent in capitation, while the focus on preventive services may stem from lack of adequate quality measurement tools for monitoring chronic disease care. Further research efforts should address how capitated physician groups might expand their QA programs to include monitoring of underuse, especially for patients with chronic disease.

摘要

目的

描述按人头付费的医生团队实施的质量保证(QA)项目;衡量他们在监测过度使用与监测不足使用方面,以及在监测和改善预防服务与慢性病护理方面的相对侧重点;并研究团队特征如何影响质量保证活动。

设计

横断面问卷调查。

地点

加利福尼亚州一个大型网络模式的健康维护组织(133个签约医生团队)。

参与者

94个医生团队(占71%),负责为290万按人头付费的患者提供护理。

主要观察指标

自我报告的质量监测和改进方法的使用情况。

结果

所有按人头付费的医生团队都开展了一些质量保证工作。各团队的质量保证项目对剖宫产率和血管成形术使用率等过度使用领域的监测,多于儿童免疫接种率和糖尿病患者视网膜检查执行情况等不足使用领域(64%对43%,P<0.001)。他们对预防服务不足使用的监测多于慢性病后续服务(54%对31%,P<0.001)。各团队对预防服务使用提醒的情况也多于对慢性病后续服务的监测(26%对15%,P<0.01)。与更高的总体质量保证活动独立相关的医生团队特征包括成立年限更长、盈利能力更高和按人头付费护理渗透率更高。

结论

按人头付费将很大一部分质量保证责任交到了医生团队手中,但质量保证的所有方面并未得到同等对待。对过度使用的重视可能源于按人头付费固有的经济激励,而对预防服务的关注可能源于缺乏用于监测慢性病护理的足够质量衡量工具。进一步的研究应探讨按人头付费的医生团队如何扩大其质量保证项目,以包括对不足使用情况的监测,尤其是对慢性病患者的监测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验