Shan Y, Moster M L, Roemer R A, Siegfried J B
Department of Neurosensory Sciences, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000 Mar-Apr;37(2):73-8. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20000301-05.
To study the function of the parvocellular (P) and the magnocellular (M) visual systems with steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in anisometropic amblyopes.
A matrix of isolated checks was superimposed on a steady background with different check sizes and temporal frequencies to form specific stimuli to preferentially activate the P or the M visual system. The amplitude of the VEP fundamental frequency was analyzed at the electrode Oz of 5 anisometropic amblyopes and 22 normal subjects. The normal subjects were tested at two visual acuity (VA) levels, 20/20 and 20/40, modified by lenses, to match with the VA levels of the fellow eyes and the amblyopic eyes of the amblyopes, respectively.
No significant amplitude difference was found between the dominant eyes and nondominant eyes of the normal subjects for either P or M stimuli at both 20/20 and 20/40 VA levels (P>.05). No significant amplitude difference was found between the fellow eyes of the amblyopes and the dominant eyes of normals for either P or M stimuli at 20/20 VA level (P>.05). A significant amplitude difference was found between the amblyopic eyes and the nondominant eyes of the normals for P stimuli (P<.05) but not for M stimuli (P>.05) at 20/40 VA level.
The amplitude of the VEP fundamental frequency was selectively reduced for P stimuli in anisometropic amblyopic eyes. This clinical electrophysiologic finding confirms that only the function of the P visual system is abnormal in anisometropic amblyopic eyes.
利用稳态视觉诱发电位(VEP)研究屈光参差性弱视患者小细胞(P)和大细胞(M)视觉系统的功能。
将分离的方格矩阵叠加在具有不同方格大小和时间频率的稳定背景上,以形成特定刺激,优先激活P或M视觉系统。在5名屈光参差性弱视患者和22名正常受试者的Oz电极处分析VEP基频的振幅。正常受试者分别在两种视力(VA)水平下进行测试,即通过镜片矫正后的20/20和20/40,分别与弱视患者的健眼和弱视眼的VA水平相匹配。
在20/20和20/40 VA水平下,正常受试者的优势眼和非优势眼对于P或M刺激的振幅均无显著差异(P>0.05)。在20/20 VA水平下,弱视患者的健眼与正常受试者的优势眼对于P或M刺激的振幅均无显著差异(P>0.05)。在20/40 VA水平下,弱视眼与正常受试者的非优势眼对于P刺激的振幅存在显著差异(P<0.05),但对于M刺激无显著差异(P>0.05)。
屈光参差性弱视眼中P刺激的VEP基频振幅选择性降低。这一临床电生理发现证实,屈光参差性弱视眼中仅P视觉系统的功能异常。