Schokkaert E, Van de Voorde C
Center for Economic Studies, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Feb;3(2):121-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1019089223462.
In Belgium the management and administration of the compulsory and universal health insurance is left to a limited number of non-governmental non-profit sickness funds. Since 1995 these sickness funds are partially financed in a prospective way. The risk adjustment scheme is based on a regression model to explain medical expenditures for different social groups. Medical supply is taken out of the formula to construct risk-adjusted capitation payments. The risk-adjustment formula still leaves scope for risk selection. At the same time, the sickness funds were not given the instruments to exert a real influence on expenditures and the health insurance market has not been opened for new entrants. As a consequence, Belgium runs the danger of ending up in a situation with little incentives for efficiency and considerable profits from cream skimming.
在比利时,强制性全民健康保险的管理和行政工作由少数非政府非营利性疾病基金负责。自1995年以来,这些疾病基金部分采用前瞻性融资方式。风险调整方案基于一个回归模型,用于解释不同社会群体的医疗支出情况。构建风险调整后的按人头付费时,医疗供应因素被排除在公式之外。风险调整公式仍存在风险选择的空间。与此同时,疾病基金没有获得对支出施加实际影响的手段,并且健康保险市场也未向新进入者开放。因此,比利时面临着最终陷入效率激励不足且存在大量撇脂获利情况的风险。