Suppr超能文献

风险调整与对市场的担忧:比利时的案例

Risk adjustment and the fear of markets: the case of Belgium.

作者信息

Schokkaert E, Van de Voorde C

机构信息

Center for Economic Studies, KU Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Feb;3(2):121-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1019089223462.

Abstract

In Belgium the management and administration of the compulsory and universal health insurance is left to a limited number of non-governmental non-profit sickness funds. Since 1995 these sickness funds are partially financed in a prospective way. The risk adjustment scheme is based on a regression model to explain medical expenditures for different social groups. Medical supply is taken out of the formula to construct risk-adjusted capitation payments. The risk-adjustment formula still leaves scope for risk selection. At the same time, the sickness funds were not given the instruments to exert a real influence on expenditures and the health insurance market has not been opened for new entrants. As a consequence, Belgium runs the danger of ending up in a situation with little incentives for efficiency and considerable profits from cream skimming.

摘要

在比利时,强制性全民健康保险的管理和行政工作由少数非政府非营利性疾病基金负责。自1995年以来,这些疾病基金部分采用前瞻性融资方式。风险调整方案基于一个回归模型,用于解释不同社会群体的医疗支出情况。构建风险调整后的按人头付费时,医疗供应因素被排除在公式之外。风险调整公式仍存在风险选择的空间。与此同时,疾病基金没有获得对支出施加实际影响的手段,并且健康保险市场也未向新进入者开放。因此,比利时面临着最终陷入效率激励不足且存在大量撇脂获利情况的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验